Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument
10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.01.017
- VernacularTitle:衰弱综合评估工具的汉化及信效度检验
- Author:
Kun WANG
;
Changxiang CHEN
;
Shuxing LI
- Keywords:
Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument;
Chinese version;
reliability;
validity;
community;
aged people
- From:
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
2017;23(1):72-76
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To translate the English version of Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument (CFAI) into Chinese and evalu-ate its reliability and validity. Methods CFAI was translated into Chinese with the Brislin's translation mode. From May to July, 2015, 200 community aged people in Shijiazhuang, China were assessed with the Chinese version of CFAI and World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), and 30 of them were assessed with CFAI again after a week. The content validity was rated by six experts of gereology. The total scores of CFAI and WHOQOL-BREF were analyzed with Pearson's correlation, as well as the scores of CFAI test and retest. The CFAI were analyzed with Factor Analysis. The Cronbach's α was tested. Results There were 23 items in 4 dimensions. The content validity index was 0.782. Six factors were extracted by Factor Analysis and the cumulated variance was 64.05%. The total score of CFAI correlated with the score of WHOQOL-BREF (r=-0.764, P<0.001). The Cronbach's α was 0.704~0.897 in dimensions (P<0.001), and the r= 0.604~0.941 (P<0.001) between test and retest. Conclusion The Chinese version of CFAI is reliable and valid, that can be applied to evaluate frailty in community aged people.
