Outcome and Influencing Factor Analysis for Graft Vessels in Patients After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2017.02.004
- VernacularTitle:冠状动脉旁路移植术后移植血管的转归及影响因素分析
- Author:
Li LI
;
Qiang ZHAO
;
Luyue GAI
;
Tingshu YANG
;
Fang ZENG
- Keywords:
Coronary artery bypass grafting;
Graft occlusion;
vessel;
Inlfuencing factors
- From:
Chinese Circulation Journal
2017;32(2):128-131
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To investigate the outcome and inlfuencing factors of graft vessels including saphenous vein graft (SVG) and left internal mammary artery graft (LIMAG) in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: A total of 92 patients with post-CABG symptom recurrence from 2010 to 2015 were analyzed by angiography and clinical features for their native coronary vessel and graft vessel. There were 83 male and 9 female patients with the mean age of (62.6±10.8) years. The outcomes of graft vessel were assessed; correlation study was conducted between SVG, LIMAG lesions and traditional atherosclerosis risk factors like age, gender, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetic mellitus, smoking, family history of coronary artery disease (CAD) with other clinical factors such as the time of angina recurrence, thetime from coronary angiography (CAG) to CABG, type of SVG (sequential graft or individual graft), the features of native target vessel lesions prior grafting. Results: The average time from CABG to symptom recurrence was (35.10±24.7) months. There were 146 grafts including 52 LIMAG and 94 SVG (60 individual and 34 sequential grafts), the patency rate of LIMAG was higher than SVG (63.5% vs 44.7%),P=0.030. SVG lesion was positively related to symptom recurrence (OR=1.119, 95% CI 1.002-1.249,P=0.046) and trended to female gender (P=0.065), while not related to other clinical factors; LIMGA lesion was not related to any clinical factors. The patency rate of sequential SVG was higher than individual SVG (58.9% vs. 36.7%,P=0.038). The native target vessel lesion (deifned by pre-operative occlusion/stenosis) was similar between individual SVG group (24/14) and no-lesion SVG group (17/5),P=0.388; while the native target vessel lesion in LIMAG group (7/12) was lower than no-lesion LIMAG group (23/10),P=0.04. Conclusion: Post-CABG lesion was not obviously related to traditional risk factors of CAD, post-SVG lesion was positively related to the time of post-CABG angina recurrence. SVG mid-and long-term patency in sequential graft vessel was higher than that in individual graft vessel. Pre-CABG native coronary blood lfow would affect the outcome of individual LIMAG but not SVG.
