Effects of intramedullary nailing versus dynamic hip screwing on hip abduction in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2017.02.002
- VernacularTitle:髓内钉与动力髋螺钉固定治疗股骨转子间骨折术后髋部外展功能的比较
- Author:
Tao LONG
;
Chao PENG
;
Zhiyong HE
;
Jiang ZHENG
;
Zhengxia HU
;
Shougang FAN
;
Ping ZHAO
;
Mingcan CHEN
;
Erdong CHEN
;
Kainan LI
- Keywords:
Hip fractures;
Fracture fixation,internal;
Bone nails;
Abductor
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
2017;19(2):95-102
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare intramedullary nail (IN) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) regarding their effects on hip abduction following fixation of intertrochanteric fractures.Methods From January 2008 to December 2015,310 patients with intertrochanteric firacture were treated at our department.They were divided into 2 groups depending on the manner of treatment.198 patients (71 males and 127 females) were subjected to intramedullary nailing,with an average age of 74.7 ± 5.6 years;there were 50 cases of 31-A 1,134 ones of 3 1-A2 and 14 ones of 3 1-A3 according to the AO classification.112 patients (35 males and 77 females) were subjected to dynamic hip screwing,with an average age of 74.1 ± 6.7 years;there were 24 cases of 31-A1,78 ones of 31-A2 and 10 ones of 31-A3.The 2 groups were compared in terms of time for weight-bearing ambulation and stand on one leg,gait,pelvic tilt,range of hip active abduction,muscle strength of the abductor and hip function at the final follow-up.Results Of this series,284 patients were followed up for 1.5 to 8.5 years (average,3.6 years) and 26 patients died.The IN group achieved significantly better outcomes in terms of time for weight-bearing ambulation (37.6 ±4.9 d),time for stand on one leg (60.1 ± 9.5 d),cases of normal gait and normal pelvic tilt (171 and 179),muscle strength of the abductor (62.3 ±4.4 N · m),and range of hip active abduction than the DHS group (53.0 ±8.4 d;71.0 ± 12.0 d;67 and 85;56.6 ± 3.3 N · m,respectively) (P ＜ 0.05).There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the hip function at the final follow-up(91.4％ versus 84.5％ in the excellent and good rate)(P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Compared with dynamic hip screwing,intramedullary nailing has a limited effect on hip abduction so that the patients may benefit from quicker functional recovery and faster improvement in quality of life.
