Giant cell tumor of bone in proximal tibia: a multicenter big-sample retrospective study
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2017.06.001
- VernacularTitle:胫骨近端骨巨细胞瘤的多中心大样本回顾性研究
- Author:
Ming XU
;
Kai ZHENG
;
Xiuchun YU
;
Liming ZHAO
;
Yongcheng HU
;
Zhen WANG
;
Zhaoming YE
;
Nong LIN
;
Sujia WU
;
Guochuan ZHANG
;
Shibing GUO
- Keywords:
Giant cell tumor of bone;
Tibia;
Recurrence;
Multicenter study
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2017;37(6):321-328
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To retrospectively analyze clinical features,treatment methods and efficacy of giant cell tumor of bone in proximal tibia,and to investigate risk factors affecting tumor recurrence and functional outcomes.Methods A total of 250 patients with giant cell tumor of bone in proximal tibia confirmed by pathology,who had undergone surgical treatment from March 2000 to July 2014,were enrolled in this study.There were 132 males and 118 females,with an average age of (34.59±12.86) years.A total of 140 patients who were followed up for more than 3 years were included in this study,and there were 72 males and 68 females,with an average age of (34.46± 11.96) years.There were 11 cases of Campanacci grade Ⅰ,58 cases of grade Ⅱ,71 cases of grade Ⅲ and pathological fracture of 47 cases.According to surgical methods,they were divided into bone grafting group (49 cases),bone cement filling group (34 cases),prosthesis group (46 cases) and others group (11 cases).The epidemiology,clinical and radiographic features and risk factors affecting tumor recurrence and functional outcomes were analyzed.Results A total of 140 patients were followed up,the follow-up period was 36-324 months,with an average of 95.4 months,and the median follow-up time was 88 months.Recurrence was found in 26 cases,and recurrence rate was 18.57％,with an average recurrence interval of 25.85 months.Recurrence was found in 17 cases in the first 2 years.The 5-year free survival rate was 77.60％.The recurrence rates were 18.37％ in bone grafting group,20.59％ in bone cement filling group,15.22％ in prosthesis group and 27.27％ in the others group,no statistically difference was found on recurrence rate and free survival rate (P=0.805,P=0.558).Recurrence was not related to all kinds of factors.A variety of related factors affecting postoperative recurrence were analyzed,sex,the first diagnosis of the original recurrence,left and right side,whether the eccentricity,fracture,cortical bone destruction,soft tissue mass,surgical methods,high-speed grinding,auxiliary application,and there was no significant correlation between recurrence and these factors.The MSTS 93 score was 25.26±4.31.Function of the primary patients was better than that of recurrence (P=0.044).Function of the patients treated with curettage with or without internal fixation was better than that with segmental resection (P=0.011).Function of the patients treated with grafting or bone cement filling was better than that with prosthesis or allograft-prosthesis reconstruction (P=0.004).There were no significant correlation between MSTS function score and gender,left and right side,whether the eccentricity,whether fractures,cortical bone destruction (Campanacci grade),whether there is soft tissue mass,whether the use of assisted inactivation,whether the use of grinding or internal fixation.Conclusion Various surgical methods had no significant effect on the recurrence of proximal tibial GCT,as for GCT in proximal tibia,there is no relation between recucrrence and related factors.Whether primary tumor and surgical methods are two important factors affecting limb function.
