Differential Diagnosis Using Two Electrophysiological Testing Methods for Radial Tunnel Syndrome
- VernacularTitle:两种不同神经电生理检查法对桡管综合征的鉴别诊断
- Author:
Yuexin HU
;
Qiu LUO
;
Mei TANG
;
Qin HUANG
;
Tao WEI
;
Lijuan AO
- Keywords:
Radial tunnel syndrome;
Electrophysiological testing;
Posterior interosseous nerve
- From:
Journal of Kunming Medical University
2016;37(9):91-95
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the traditional electrophysiological testing with modified methods for differential diagnosis of Radial Tunnel Syndrome (RTS).Methods A total of 87 selected patients were initially diagnosed as Lateral Epicondylitis (LE) or Tennis Elbow (TE) by doctors from the Outpatient Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation.Medical history was asked.Patients received physical examination and examinations for the sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) of superficial radial nerve,the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) of radial nerve and needle electromyography (EMG) to record the muscle Motor Unit Action Potentials (MUAPs).Then,the modified methods for CMAP of radial nerve were conducted on the forearm in the neutral,pronation and supination positions.Three values of CMAP latency were compared.RTS was diagnosed when the difference value ≥0.3 ms.The x 2 test was used to compare the positive detectable rates of the two methods for the RTS diagnosis.Results Thirteen out of 87 patients were diagnosed as RTS,among which three had interosseous nerve lesion and one had superficial radial nerve lesion.The traditional EMG failed to diagnose the remaining 9 RTS cases.These patients were finally diagnosed due to their latency difference of radial nerve CMAP ≥0.3ms when their forearms were examined in three positions.Conclusion The modified electrophysiology method shows a higher positive rate for the diagnosis of RTS.(P＜0.05).
