Patient's Self-recognition of Reduced Visual Acuity Due to Recurrence of Macular Edema and Prompt Visitation to the Hospital in Retinal Vein Occlusion.
10.3341/kjo.2014.28.3.213
- Author:
Seong Hun JEONG
1
;
Jae Hui KIM
;
Jong Woo KIM
;
Tae Gon LEE
;
Chul Gu KIM
;
Su Jin YOO
;
Mun Jung CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Ophthalmology, Kim's Eye Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kimoph@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords:
Macular edema;
Recognition;
Retinal vein occlusion;
Visual acuity
- MeSH:
Female;
Fluorescein Angiography;
Follow-Up Studies;
Fundus Oculi;
Humans;
Macular Edema/*diagnosis/etiology/physiopathology;
Male;
Middle Aged;
*Patient Readmission;
Recurrence;
Retinal Vein Occlusion/*complications/diagnosis/physiopathology;
Retrospective Studies;
Tomography, Optical Coherence;
*Visual Acuity
- From:Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
2014;28(3):213-219
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To evaluate patients' self-recognition of reduced visual acuity due to recurring macular edema in retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records of patients who were diagnosed with recurring macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion was performed. The proportion of patients who recognized reduced visual acuity due to the recurrence of macular edema and who visited the hospital before the scheduled follow-up date was determined. Parameters including age, sex, diagnosis, visual acuity before recurrence of macular edema, and extent of visual acuity reduction due to recurrence of macular edema were compared in patients who recognized a reduction in visual acuity and those who did not. The proportion of patients who visited the hospital promptly was also determined. RESULTS: Forty eyes of 40 patients were included in the analysis. Sixteen and 24 patients were diagnosed with central retinal vein occlusion and branch retinal vein occlusion, respectively. Twenty-one patients (52.5%) recognized reduced visual acuity due to recurring macular edema. These patients were younger (59.2 +/- 7.6 vs. 64.8 +/- 9.4 years, p = 0.046), had better visual acuity before recurrence of macular edema (0.52 +/- 0.48 vs. 1.02 +/- 0.46, p = 0.002), and exhibited a greater reduction in visual acuity after recurrence of macular edema (0.34 +/- 0.24 vs. 0.14 +/- 0.13, p = 0.003). Only four patients visited the hospital before the scheduled follow-up date, and all of these patients lived relatively close to the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: For prompt treatment of recurring macular edema, more intensive education about the self-estimation of visual acuity is necessary, particularly for elderly patients who have relatively poor visual acuity. In addition, a simple and easy way to identify the recurrence of macular edema at the local clinic should be established for patients who live relatively far from the hospital.
