Comparison of postoperative recovery situation between laparoscopic radical resection and conventional open surgery for patients with colorectal cancer
10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2017.04.028
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜大肠癌根治术与传统开放式手术术后恢复指标比较研究
- Author:
Ning LIU
;
Yongqiang XU
;
Haijun LI
- Keywords:
Open surgery;
Laparoscopy;
Colorectal cancer;
Postoperative recovery
- From:
China Medical Equipment
2017;14(4):106-109
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To compare postoperative recovery situation between laparoscopic radical resection and conventional open surgery for patients with colorectal cancer and determine the optimal surgery scheme. Methods: 96 patients with colorectal cancer were divided into observation group (48 cases)and control group (48 cases) according to the random number table method. The patients of observation group were treated by using laparoscopic radical resection while the patients of control group were treated by conventional open surgery. A series of clinical manifestation, such as perioperative situation, abdominal pain, recovery situation, complication, pre-and post operative nutrition and quality of life, of these patients were compared between the two groups. Results: The operation time, average bleeding volume, postoperative exhaust time and hospitalization time of the observation group were significantly less than those of the control group (t=5.583, t=48.934, t=7.347, t=4.862; P<0.05). The incidence of abdominal complication of observation group (8.3%) was significantly lower than that of the control group (27.1%) (x2=5.79, P<0.05). The incidence of delayed healing of incision was 6.3% in observation group, which was significantly lower than that (20.8%) of control group (x2=4.36, P<0.05). For observation group or control group, the serum ALB, PA and LC of post-operation, respectively, was higher than those of pre-operation in 1 week after operation. And serum ALB, PA and LC of observation group, respectively, was significantly higher than that of control group (t=4.628, t=3.642, t=3.412; P<0.05). Compared with before operation, physical function, role function, emotional function, cognitive function and social functionthe quality of life of the two group were obviously improved, on the other hand, all of these aspects of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group (t=-12.845, t=-7.634, t=0.5001, t=-4.096, t=-2.647, P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the traditional open surgery for patients with colorectal cancer, the postoperative recovery of laparoscopic radical resection is better, more obvious and more effective for them.
