Observation and comparison of the efficacy of three kinds of operational method for treatment of thoraco- lumbar fractures
10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2017.06.020
- VernacularTitle:3种手术方法治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效比较
- Author:
Jing FENG
;
Shiyang DU
;
Mi HUANG
;
Huan NI
;
Ping XIA
- Keywords:
Thoracic and lumbar fractures;
Paraspinal muscle;
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw;
Opera-tional approach;
Curative effect
- From:
The Journal of Practical Medicine
2017;33(6):923-927
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare treatment and efficacy of thoracolumbar fractures by using three different screw fixations:traditional approach,the vertebral side clearance into the road and percutaneous pedicle. Methods A total of 82 single segmental thoracic lumbar fractures cases hospitalized from March 2011 to March 2014 ,with male 67 cases ,female 15 cases ,and average age(33.7+/-12.5)years old. Patients were randomly divided into three groups:traditional approach group (n = 23),operation through paraspinal muscle gap group (n = 30),percutaneous group(n = 29). These following indicators will be compared in three groups:duration of operation ,intraoperative blood loss ,intraoperative fluoroscopy time ,postoperative flow ,VAS scores before and after operation and Oswestry disability index , difference of spinal sagittal position Cobb′s Angle. Results Compared with the traditional approach group ,operation through paraspinal muscle gap group and percu-taneous group have obvious advantages in duration of operation,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative flow,VAS scores before and after operation ,the Oswestry disability index. Additionally ,above mentioned three surgical methods could recover kyphosis deformity ,and there was no statistically significant difference among three groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of monosegmental thoracolumbar fractures ,compared with traditional approach ,operation through paraspinal muscle gap and percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation have more advantages which includes fewer trauma,less bleeding,faster recovery and lower incidence of postoperative low back pain.
