Analysis of in-hospital delay factors of influencing intravenous thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke
10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2017.04.003
- VernacularTitle:影响急性缺血性卒中患者静脉溶栓治疗的院内延误因素分析
- Author:
Jingjing LI
;
Xu TONG
;
Huaguang ZHENG
;
Yilong WANG
;
Jing LIU
;
Jinghua LIU
;
Yueming TIAN
;
Nan SHI
;
Yibin CAO
- Keywords:
Stroke;
Delay care;
Alteplase;
Intravenous thrombolysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases
2017;14(4):183-188
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the influencing factors of in-hospital delay using alteplase for intravenous thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Methods From January 2006 to May 2015,220 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to the Department of Neurology,Tangshan Gongren Hospital Affiliated to North China University of Science and Technology were enrolled retrospectively.They all received alteplase for intravenous thrombolytic therapy.Their mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission was 16±8.According to door-to-needle time (DNT),they were divided into either a delay group (DNT >60 min;n=151) or a non-delay group (DNT ≤60 min;n=69).The baseline data,laboratory tests,onset-to-door (OTD) time,imaging,and etiology classification of trial of org 10172 in acute stroke treatment (TOAST) of both groups were recorded.Univariate analysis was performed on both groups,and further multivariate logistic analysis was performed.Results (1) The proportion of the past history of transient ischemic attack,blood glucose level on admission,time from onset to hospital in the non-delay group were significantly higher than those of the delay group.There were significant differences between the two groups (43.5%[30/69] vs.3.3%[5/151],7.9±3.0 mmol/L vs.6.9±2.1 mmol/L,95±53 min vs.80±34 min,all P<0.05).There were significant differences in the constituent ratio of TOAST classification between the two groups (P<0.05).There were no significant differences in other baseline data and clinical features between the two groups (all P>0.05).(2) Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the risks of patients with the past history of transient ischemic attack (OR,0.330,95%CI 0.109-0.998,P=0.046),elevated blood glucose levels on admission (OR,0.775,95%CI 0.657-0.914,P=0.005),prolonged onset-to-door time (OR,0.648,95%CI 0.504-0.831,P=0.013),internal carotid artery lesions (OR,0.192,95%CI 0.038-0.960,P=0.044) for occurring in-hospital delay after thrombolysis were low.Systolic pressure on admission(OR,1.275,95%CI 1.091-1.491,P=0.027)and cardioembolism(OR,3.892,95%CI 1.661-9.112,P=0.006) for occurring in-hospital delay after thrombolysisin were high.Conclusion The patients with past history of transient ischemic attack,higher blood glucose,prolonged onset-to-door time,and having internal carotid artery lesions may be cause the attention of family members and doctors,and were less prone to having thrombolytic in-hospital delay,whereas those with higher systolic blood pressure on admission and cardioembolism were prone to having in-hospital delay.
