Effect of lumbar puncture cerebrospinal fluid replacement on nuclear factor κB in cerebrospinal fluid and prognosis in patients with aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage after endovascular embolization
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4165.2017.02.007
- VernacularTitle:腰椎穿刺脑脊液置换对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者血管内栓塞术后脑脊液核因子κB和转归的影响
- Author:
Bing BAO
;
Zhiying CHEN
;
Dandan TAN
;
Xiangbin WU
;
Zhongbin XIA
;
Tao WU
;
Hongbing NIE
- Keywords:
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage;
Intracranial Aneurysm;
Embolization,Therapeutic;
Drainage;
NF-κB;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
International Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases
2017;25(2):140-144
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effect of early cerebrospinal fluid replacement on nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) level and clinical outcomes in patients with aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) after endovascular embolization.Methods Patients with aSAH received aneurysm embolization were enrolled.They were divided into a cerebrospinal fluid replacement group and a non-cerebrospinal fluid replacement group according to the treatment scheme.All patients were treated with cerebral aneurysm coil embolization within 3 days after admission.The cerebrospinal fluid replacement group performed lumbar puncture cerebrospinal fluid replacement within 24 h after coil embolization,once every other day,20-30 ml of cerebrospinal fluid was replaced each time and 3 mg dexamethasone was injected intrathecally.The NF-κB levels in cerebrospinal fluid were detected at day 1,7 and 14 after the coil embolization.The primary outcome measures were the clinical outcomes determined by the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) at 3 months after onset.Good outcome was defined as mRS score 0-2 or GOS ＞ 3.The secondary outcome measures included severe complications (hydrocephalus,cerebral vasospasm,cerebral infarction,and rebleeding) and death.Results A total of 81 patients with aSAH received aneurysm embolization were enrolled,including 42 in the cerebrospinal fluid replacement group and 39 in the non-cerebrospinal fluid replacement group.There was no significant differences in the baseline data between the cerebrospinal fluid replacement group and the non-cerebrospinal fluid replacement group (all P ＞0.05).The duration of neck stiffness in the cerebrospinal fluid replacement group was significantly shorter than that in the non-cerebrospinal fluid replacement group (11.3 ± 3.2 d vs.16.5 ± 3.5 d;t =6.985,P ＜ 0.001).The cerebrospinal fluid NF-κB levels were progressively reduced at day 1,7 and 14 after coil embolization in the cerebrospinal fluid rephcement group and non-cerebrospinal fluid rephcement group (all P ＜0.05),but the ccerebrospinal fluid levels of NF-κB in the cerebrospinal fluid replacement group at each time point were significantly lower than those in the non-cerebrospinal fluid replacement group (all P ＜ 0.01).The good outcome rates evaluated according to the mRS score (92.9％ vs.56.4％;x2 =14.446,P ＜ 0.001) and GOS score (97.6％ vs.76.9％;x2 =8.004,P=0.005) in the cerebrospinal fluid replacement group at 3 months were significantly higher than those in the non-cerebrospinal fluid replacement group,and the incidence of cerebral vasospasm was significantly lower than that in the non-cerebrospinal fluid replacement group (14.3％ vs.33.3％;x2 =4.086,P =0.043).Conelusiom Cerebrospinal fluid replacement therapy can reduce the incidence of cerebral vasospasm in patients with aSAH receiving aneurysm embolization and improve clinical outcomes.Its mechanism may be associated with the decrease of NF-κB level in cerebrospinal fluid.
