Clinical analysis of kinetic enucleation and transurethral resection on treatment of hyperplasia of prostate
10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2017.11.018
- VernacularTitle:剜除术与电切术治疗超大前列腺增生的临床疗效分析
- Author:
Honglin CHENG
;
Chuang GUO
;
Xuming LI
;
Zongyong CHENG
;
Feng LI
;
Li ZHANG
;
Qingsong WANG
- Keywords:
prostatic hyperplasia;
bipolar transurethral plasma kinetic enucleation of prostate;
transurethral resection of the prostate
- From:
Chongqing Medicine
2017;46(11):1497-1499
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare and analyze clinical effects of Bipolar transurethral plasma kinetic enucleation of prostate (PKEP) and transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP) on the treatment huge benign prostatic hyperplasia.Methods Nine-six cases of huge benign prostatic hyperplasia were selected in this hospital from March 2012 to March 2015.All the patients were divided into two groups according to different operation method,namely PKEP group and TURP group.Then the operative time,bleeding amount,bladder washing time,hospital stay,complications between two groups were compared,and the international prostate symptom score (IPSS),quality of life score (QOL),maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax),residual urine volume 6 months before and after operation were compared between the two groups.Results The operative time [(100.0 ± 3.5)min],bleeding amount [(161.0 ± 9.2) mL],bladder washing time[(15.2 ± 1.2) h],hospital stay[(10.8 ± 2.6) d],complications (6 cases) in PKEP group were less than that in the TURP group,which were(132.0±4.2)min,(198.0±12.1)mL,(36.8±1.3)h,(13.6±2.9)d,complications (18 cases)respectively(P＜0.05).The IPSS,QOL,Qmax,residual urine volume in both group were significantly improved compared with surgery before(P＜0.05),and there were no significant differences between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion PKEP and TURP both are effective surgeries for the treatment of huge BPH,while PKEP has short operation time,less intraoperarive bleeding and low incidence of complications,it is worthy of further clinical promotion.
