Comparison and evaluation of abnormal result detection methods of platelet
10.7687/J.ISSN1003-8868.2017.03.097
- VernacularTitle:血小板检测结果异常时3种检测方法的比较和评估
- Author:
Xuebin MA
;
Ming YANG
;
Fang WANG
;
Xinqiang HUANG
;
Shuchun DING
;
Jingyi WANG
;
Youyou DONG
;
Qiangyuan ZHAO
- Keywords:
automatic hematology analyzer;
platelet;
impedance method;
optical method;
microscopy method
- From:
Chinese Medical Equipment Journal
2017;38(3):97-100
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical values of impedance method,optical method and microscopy when used to detect platelet abnormal results.Methods Platelet re-examinations by optical method and microscopy were carried out in case of low confidence degree in platelet test with impedance method by XE-2100 automatic hematology analyzer,and then the results by the three methods were compared.Results Most of the low-confidence-degree results by impedance method could be corrected by re-examination by optical method,and the remained had to turn to microscopy due to unsatisfied requirements of the instrument.Conclusion Optical method has to be involved to correct the platelet abnormal results by XE2100 automatic hematology analyzer,and microscopy should be applied in case optical method doesn't work.The three methods gains advantages and disadvantages of themselves,and can be supplementaries for one another.