Antimicrobial resistance profile of the clinical isolates in Fuzhou First People's Hospital, Jiangxi during 2015
10.16718/j.1009-7708.2017.02.010
- VernacularTitle:2015年江西抚州市第一人民医院临床分离菌耐药性分析
- Author:
Changxiu NING
;
Xirong QIU
;
Limin HU
- Keywords:
antimicrobial?agent;
antimicrobial?susceptibility?testing;
antimicrobial?resistance?profile
- From:
Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
2017;17(2):171-176
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the antimicrobial resistance profile of clinical isolates in Fuzhou First People's Hospital during 2015. Methods? The?bacterial?isolates?were?identified?using?ATB?Reader?semi-automatic?equipment?via?colorimetric?method.?The antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by disk diffusion method. The results were interpreted according to the CLSI breakpoints issued in 2015. All data were analyzed by WHONET 5.5 software. Results A total of 1215 non-duplicate clinical isolates were collected during 2015, including gram negative bacteria (70.6%) and gram positive bacteria (29.4%). The prevalence of MRSA was 50.0 % in S. aureus and the prevalence of MRCNS was 84.1 % in coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Most MRSA strains (80.3?%)?were?resistant?to?erythromycin,?tetracycline?and?norfloxacin.?No?staphylococcal?isolate?was?found?resistant?to?vancomycin?or teicoplanin. The prevalence of ESBLs was 52.5% in E. coli and 34.7% in K. pneumoniae. Ten strains of Enterobacteriaceae were resistant to carbapenems. Less than10% of the P. aeruginosa isolates were resistant to amikacin, cefoperazone-sulbactam, meropenem and tobramycin. About 2.4% and 51.8% of the Acinetobacter isolates were resistant to polymyxin E and cefoperazone-sulbactam, respectively, while more than 75% of these strains were resistant to other commonly used antimicrobial agents. Conclusions Most of the clinical isolates are gram-negative bacilli in our hospital during 2015. Antimicrobial resistance remains an important clinical concern, which should be addressed seriously.
