The Clinical Results of a Total Proctocolectomy with an Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: 12 Cases.
- Author:
Gyoung Chun LEE
1
;
Seung Hyun LEE
;
Byung Kwon AHN
;
Sung Uhn BAEK
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Gospel Hospital, School of Medicine, Kosin University, Busan, Korea. Beak001@ns.kosinmed.or.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Total proctocolectomy;
Ileal pouch anal anastomosis;
Postoperative complication;
Functional outcomes
- MeSH:
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli;
Colitis, Ulcerative;
Defecation;
Fecal Incontinence;
Fistula;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Ileostomy;
Interviews as Topic;
Intestinal Obstruction;
Medical Records;
Postoperative Complications;
Proctocolectomy, Restorative;
Retrospective Studies;
Soil
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology
2003;19(1):6-12
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: A restorative proctocolectomy has been accepted as the operation of choice for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. The purpose of this study was to assess the postoperative complications and functional outcomes following a total proctocolectomy with a J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: The medical records of 12 patients who had undergone a total proctocolectomy, with a J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, between January 1997 and June 2002, were retrospectively reviewed according to sex, age, underlying disease and postoperative complications. We evaluated the functional outcomes using medical record reviews and patients and telephone interviews. RESULTS: Total proctocolectomy, with a J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, were done for ulcerative colitis (n=2) and familial adenomatous polyposis (n=10). A diverting ileostomy was performed in 8 patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 7 patients (58%), intestinal obstructions in 4 and complications related with anastomosis in 3, i.e. J ileal pouch leakage (n=2) and ileal pouch-vaginal fistula (n=1). Re-operations, due to postoperative complications, were performed in 4 patients, i.e. small bowel segmental resection (n=1), adhesiolysis (n=1), diverting ileostomy (n=1) and ileal pouch resection & reconstruction (n=1). The daily median defecation frequencies were 7.7 (range 4~20) a month after the operation, 5.4 (3~12) at 2~3 months, 4.5 (3~7) at 6 months and 4.1 (3~5) at 12 months, following the operation. Two patients had gas incontinence, 1 had fluid incontinence, 4 had night soiling and 3 needed pads, but these incontinences, the need for anti-diarrhea medication and the use of pads, all improved within 6 months of the operation. Fluid incontinence and the use of pads improved within 3 months of the operation, gas incontinence and night soiling improved within 6 months of the operation. The mean length of follow-up was 30.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative complication rate was 58%. Thirty-three percent of patients had fecal incontinence, but all these improved within 6 months. The long- term functional outcomes, after a total proctocolectomy with J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, were satisfactory, and the postoperative complications acceptable. The postoperative complication rates were no different between the protective diverting ileostomy and non-ileostomy .
