Comparison of Changes in Higher-order Aberrations between Conventional and Wavefront-guided LASEK.
10.3341/jkos.2007.48.8.1028-1035
- Author:
Sang Mok LEE
1
;
Min Joung LEE
;
Mee Kum KIM
;
Won Ryang WEE
;
Jin Hak LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. kmk9@snu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Case control study;
Higher order aberrations;
LASEK;
Postoperative change;
Wavefront
- MeSH:
Case-Control Studies;
Coma;
Humans;
Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted*;
Medical Records
- From:Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
2007;48(8):1028-1035
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the postoperative higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and factors affecting postoperative changes in HOAs in eyes that underwent wavefront-guided LASEK (laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy), compared with the eyes that underwent conventional LASEK. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 221 patients who had undergone LASEK or wavefront guided LASEK with VISX WaveScan and VISX Star S4 eximer laser by a single surgeon (427 total eye operations). We matched 29 eyes of the LASEK and the wavefront LASEK groups (58 eyes total) according to the guideline: preoperative refractive power differences must be within 1 diopter and preoperative root-mean-square (RMS) of total HOAs differences must be within 0.01 micrometer. Preoperative wavefront aberrations and two-months postoperative wavefront aberrations and associated factors were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: Postoperative total HOAs, comas, and spherical aberrations increased significantly from 0.36+/-0.10 micrometer to 0.49+/-0.16 micrometer (p=.001), 0.21+/-0.09 micrometer to 0.31+/-0.14 micrometer (p=.003), and 0.03+/-0.10 micrometer to 0.10+/-0.20 micrometer (p=.043), respectively, in the conventional LASEK group. In the wavefront LASEK group, postoperative HOAs, comas, and spherical aberrations significantly increased from 0.36+/-0.10 micrometer to 0.46+/-0.14 micrometer (p=.004), 0.18+/-0.10 micrometer to 0.29+/-0.14 micrometer (p=.002), and 0.09+/-0.14 micrometer to 0.19+/-0.14 micrometer (p=.006), respectively. There were no significant differences in HOAs between the two groups. A strong negative correlation between preoperative total HOAs and a multiple of increase in total HOAs postoperatively was found, with the negative correlation being stronger in the wavefront-guided LASEK group (Pearson's correlation coefficient =-0.697, p<.001) than in the LASEK group (Pearson's correlation coefficient =-0.632, p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant decreases in HOAs in the eyes that underwent wavefront-guided LASEK compared with the matched control eyes of patients that underwent conventional LASEK. Analyzing the tendency of a multiple of increase in total HOAs according to the preoperative HOAs, it suggests that the wavefront-guided LASEK may be more effective in suppressing an increase in total HOAs in the eyes with higher preoperative HOAs.
