Compare the clinical effect of unarmed cardiopulmonary resuscitation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation machine in the emergency room
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6315.2017.01.010
- VernacularTitle:徒手心肺复苏与应用心肺复苏机复苏的效果比较
- Author:
Dahai HUANG
;
Mingqiang LIN
;
Youkai LYU
- Keywords:
Cardiopulmonary arrest;
Unarmed cardiopulmonary resuscitation;
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation machine;
Complication;
Oxygen saturation;
Partial pressure of carbon dioxide;
Partial pressure of oxygen
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2017;33(1):37-40
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effect of unarmed cardiopulmonary resuscitationand cardiopulmonary resuscitationmachine in the emergency room.Methods One hundred cases patients with cardiopulmonary arrest in Hainan Agricultural Reclamation General Hospital from February 2014 to February 2016 were analyzed.The control group(n=50) were given unarmed cardiopulmonary resuscitation,while thetest group(n=50) were given ardiopulmonary resuscitation machine.Two groups' before and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation of arterial blood gas index(oxygen saturation (SaO2),C02 partial pressure (PaC02),oxygen partial pressure(Pa02)),cardiopulmonary resuscitation effectiveness and the success rate,and complications were compared.Results Before cardiopulmonary resuscitation,there were no significant differences on arterial blood gas index (SaO2,PaCO2,PaO2) between the two groups (t =0.069,0.097,0.121,P ＞ 0.05).After cardiopulmonary resuscitation,the SaO2,PaO2 of the test group were higher than that of the control group ((98.60± 8.51) ％ vs.(86.37 ± 7.84) ％,(13.84 ± 1.40) kPa vs.(8.69± 1.21) kPa),while PaCO2 of test group was lower than the control group ((3.24 ± 0.56) kPa vs.(6.41 ± 0.87) kPa),the differences were significant(t =7.474,21.665,19.679,P ＜ 0.05).The cardiopulmonary resuscitation of effective rate,success rate of test group were higher than the control group (84.00％ (42/50) vs.62.00％ (31/50),26.00％ (13/50)vs.10.00％(5/50),x2=6.139,4.336,P＜0.05).The total complication rate of the test group was lower than the control group(8.00％ (4/50) vs.28.00％ (14/50)),the difference was significant (x2 =6.775,P ＜0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation machine is significantly superior to unarmed cardiopulmonary resuscitation,which can effectively improve the patient's arterial blood gas state,improve the efficiency and success rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation,and reduce the complications.
