A meta-analysis of randomized trials for long-term major complications following off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting
10.11958/20150295
- VernacularTitle:非体外循环和体外循环下冠状动脉搭桥术远期并发症比较的Meta分析
- Author:
Baichuan WANG
- Keywords:
coronary artery bypass;
off-pump;
extracorporeal circulation;
postoperative complications;
mortality;
myocardial infarction;
stroke;
Meta-analysis;
on pump coronary artery bypass grafting;
revascularization
- From:
Tianjin Medical Journal
2017;45(1):95-99
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the long-term complications of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of long-term complications of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. According to the Cochrane system evaluation method, the quality of the research literature was evaluated by the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the RevMan5.2 software was used for meta analysis. Results A total of 9 studies were included, including 11 660 patients, 5 794 patients in the OPCABG group and 5 866 cases in the ONCABG group. There was no significant difference in mortality between the OPCABG group and the ONCABG group (OR=1.10, 95%CI:0.94-1.30,P=0.22] and no significant difference in myocardial infarction (OR=0.90, 95%CI:0.76-1.06,P=0.21). However, the difference in revascularization was statistically significant between the two groups (OR=1.41, 95%CI:1.09-1.83,P=0.009). The long-term incidence of stroke was significantly lower in OPCABG group than that of ONCABG group (OR=0.75, 95%CI: 0.57-0.98,P=0.04]. Conclusion The on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting can effectively reduce the occurrence of long-term revascularization. However, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting can effectively reduce the risks of stroke.
