Comparison of the therapeutic effects of two surgical methods for treating primary angle closure glaucoma ;with cataract
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2017.03.032
- VernacularTitle:两种手术方法治疗原发性闭角型青光眼合并白内障的疗效比较
- Author:
Xingwang BAO
- Keywords:
Primary angle-closure glaucoma;
Cataract;
Small incision cataract extraction;
Phacoe-mulsification
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2017;24(3):448-451
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To study the different clinical effects between the method ofperipheral iridectomy+trabeculectomy combined with cataract extraction with small incision+intraocular lens implantationand the method ofperipheral iridectomy+trabeculectomy combined with cataract with phacoemulsification+intraocular lens implan-tation,so as to provide guidance for clinic.Methods 40 cases were randomly divided into A and B groups,and A group included 19 patients (31 eyes),while B group included 21 patients (37 eyes).A group was treated with the peripheral iridectomy +trabeculectomy combined with cataract extraction with small incision +intraocular lens implantationmethod,and B group was cured with the method ofperipheral iridectomy+trabeculectomy combined with cataract with phacoemulsification +intraocular lens implantationmethod.In each group,the eye pressures, visual acuity,central anterior chamber depths of before and after treatment were compared to study the clinical effect. And after treatment,the improvement amount of eye pressure,visual acuity,central anterior chamber depths and the complication rates were compared between the two groups,so as to determine the better method.Results After treatment,the eye pressure,visual acuity,central anterior chamber depths in A group were significantly improved [(21.71 ±10.17)mmHg,(0.29 ±0.09)and (1.97 ±0.47)mm,t=11.12,6.93,17.39,all P<0.05].The eye pressure,visual acuity,central anterior chamber depths in B group were significantly improved[(19.45 ±9.54)mmHg, (0.35 ±0.16)and (1.98 ±0.39)mm,t=6.52,5.78,17.78,all P<0.05].After treatment,the eye pressures in A and B groups were cut down[(21.74 ±10.17)and (19.45 ±9.54)mmHg],and there was no statistical significant difference between the two groups (t=0.96,P=0.17).The visual acuity in A and B groups were improved[(0.29 ± 0.09)and (0.35 ±0.16)degrees],and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (t=1.86,P=0.97).The central anterior chamber depths in A and B groups were improved[(1.97 ±0.47)and (1.98 ± 0.39)mm],and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (t=0.09,P=0.54).The incidence rates of complication in A and B groups were 48.39% and 21.62%,respectively,and the difference between two groups was significant (χ2 =5.44,P=0.02).Conclusion The two treatments had significant and equal clinical effects,while because of its lower incidence rate of complication,the method ofperipheral iridectomy+trabeculectomy combined with cataract with phacoemulsification+intraocular lens implantationis more safe than the other one.
