Effects of antenatal antibiotic exposure on clinical characteristics and pathogen distribution in neonatal early-onset sepsis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2017.01.006
- VernacularTitle:产前使用抗生素对新生儿早发型败血症临床特征及病原菌分布的影响
- Author:
Yao ZHU
;
Yayin LIN
;
Jidong LAI
;
Xinzhu LIN
- Keywords:
Sepsis;
Antibiotic prophylaxis;
Prenatal care;
Infant,newborn
- From:
Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine
2017;20(1):21-26
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the incidence and pathogen distribution of neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) following exposure to antenatal antibiotics.MethodsOne hundred and eighty-four neonates who were admitted to Maternal and Child Care Hospital of Xiamen and identified as having EOS from January 2010 to December 2015 were enrolled. The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. According to antenatal antibiotic exposure time, the infants were divided into the antibiotics group (≥4 hours) and the control group (<4 hours). Women in late pregnancy (35-37 weeks of gestation) underwent group BStreptococcus (GBS) screening using standard bacterial culture beginning from Janaury 2014 as screening group. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis was given if the GBS culture was positive. Infants delivered before January 2014 were included in the no-screening group. Pathogen distribution and the difference in drug resistance between the two groups were compared by a two-independent samplest-test andChi-square test.ResultsIn the antibiotics group, the percentages of birth weight lower than 2 500 g, preterm infants, asphyxia, and positive rates of GBS and blood culture were 24.3%(17/70), 14.3% (10/70), 2.9% (2/70), 7.1% (5/70) and 70.0% (49/70), respectively, and were significantly lower than those in the control group [39.5%(45/114), 28.1% (32/114), 14.9% (17/114), 19.3%(22/114) and 88.6% (101/114), respectively] (χ2=4.478, 4.678, 6.807, 5.118 and 9.957, allP<0.05). There was no difference in the positive rate of coagulase-negativeStaphylococci andE. coli culture, or in the incidence of purulent meningitis, septic shock, disseminated intravascular coagulation, hospital stay and fatality rate between the antibiotics group and control group (allP>0.05). Compared with the no-screening group, the positive rate of GBS decreased [7.6% (5/66) vs 18.6% (22/118)] and the positive rate of fungal infection increased [7.6%(5/66) vs 1.7% (2/118)] in the screening group (χ2=4.141,P=0.042;χ2=4.000,P=0.046). The distribution of other pathogenic bacteria such as coagulase-negativeStaphylococci andE. coli was not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05, respectively). Drug resistance rates ofStaphylococcus (Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negativeStaphylococcus) to oxacillin and piperacillin-sulbactam were higher in the screening group than in the no-screening group [82.6% (19/23) vs 52.9% (18/34),χ2=5.302; 78.3% (18/23) vs 47.1% (16/34),χ2=5.549; bothP<0.05], and no vancomycin resistant bacterial strains were found.ConclusionsAntenatal antibiotic exposure may be effective in reducing the occurrence of prematurity, asphyxia,and GBS infection, but it increases the rate of fungal infection, and is not effective in reducing the incidence of complications and mortality or in changing the distribution of the other pathogens in EOS. Rational indications and timing of antenatal antibiotic exposure should be taken into consideration to reduce drug resistance.
