Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma and carcinoma expleomorphic adenoma
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2017.03.008
- VernacularTitle:超声造影在大涎腺良、恶性多形性腺瘤鉴别诊断中的价值
- Author:
Liyu CHEN
;
Lingyan ZHOU
;
Lili WU
;
Minghua GE
;
Dong XU
;
Qi SHAO
- Keywords:
Contrast enhanced ultrasound;
Salivary gland neoplasms;
Pleomorphic adenoma
- From:Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
2017;26(3):259-263
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To assess the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) characteristics of pleomorphic adenoma (PA) and carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CXPA).Methods A retrospective analyse was made from the contrast-enhanced ultrasonic features of 42 PA and 8 CXPA.The features included tumor size,echotexture,boundary,shape and blood flow richness on conventional US imaging and rise time (RT),time to peak (TP),peak intensity(PI),time from peak to one half(HT),mean transit time (MTT),and area under the curve(AUC) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound.Results All of PA and CXPA were hypoechoic,but there was no difference between them in shape and blood flow richness (P ＞0.05).37.5％ CXPA has hetergeneous echotexture with the presence of anechoic area,but it appeared in only 4.8％ PA(P ＜0.05).The following findings were observed from a perfusion kinetics of CEUS in all of PA and CXPA:slow in,centripetal,heterogeneous enhancement,with no enhancement area.Well-defined margins were presented in 42 PA and in 7 CXPA(P ＜0.05).Their time-intensity curves showed RT,TP,HT and MTT in CXPA group were obviously higher than those in the PA group(P ＜0.05).However there was no statistical difference in PI and AUC between both groups (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions Conventional US and CEUS perfusion patten provide limited diagnostic information for distinguishing PA from CXPA.CXPA could be diagnosed by ill defined margins,more internal anechoic area and poorly defined margins.But CEUS quantitative analysis can significantly promote the differentiation.
