Influence of high frequency electrosurgical equipment application in cardiac impalntable elect ornic device implantation pro cedure on the rate of pocket hematoma
10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2016.09.005
- VernacularTitle:高频电刀应用对心血管植入型电子器械囊袋血肿发生率的影响
- Author:
Baige XU
;
Yanchun LIANG
;
Yang GAO
;
Xiaolei YAN
;
Haibo YU
;
Rong LIU
;
Guoqing XU
;
Na WANG
;
Zulu WANG
;
Yaling HAN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cardiac implantable electronic device;
High frequency electrosurgical equipment;
Pocket;
Hematoma
- From:
Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
2016;24(9):502-505
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the influence of high frequency electrosurgical equipment ( HFEE) application in cardiac implantable electronic device ( CIED) implantation procedure on the rate of pocket hematoma .Methods Patients who received CIED implantation in General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region were analyzed retrospectively .HFEE was applied during CIED implantation procedure in every patient who was classified into HFEE group .Other patients without HFEE application were classified as the control group . Patients with or without bleeding tendency were sub-classified into the bleeding tendency subgroup or non-bleeding tendency subgroup respectively .Bleeding tendency subgroup was further divided into heparin bridging group and direct implantation group .The occurance rate of CIED pocket hematoma was recorded in all groups .Results A total of 3884 patients were enrolled .There were 3115 patients in the HFEE group and 769 patients in the control group .The baseline data of two groups was similar.The overall rate of CIED pocket hematoma in the total patient population during perioperative period were 2.2%(86/3884), and the rate of long term pocket infection or rupture in patients with CIED pocket hematoma was 10.5%(9/8).In the HFEE group, the rate of pocket hematoma was lower than that in the control group (1.5%vs.5.2%, P<0.001).The rates of CIED pocket hematoma in respective subgroups in the HFEE group including the bleeding tendency subgroup ( 1.8% vs.11.5%, P=0.004 ) , the non-bleeding tendency subgroup ( 1.4% vs.4.7%, P<0.001 ) and the heparin bridging group ( 2.0% vs. 11.5%, P=0.046 ) were markedly decreased as compared with the corresponding subgroups in the control group.In the control group , the rate of CIED pocket hematoma in the bleeding tendency subgroup was higher than that in the non-bleeding tendency subgroup (11.5%vs.4.7%, P=0.0046).In HFEE group, there was no significant difference in the rate of CIED pocket hematoma between bleeding tendency subgroup and non-bleeding tendency subgroup; and there was also no significant difference in the rate of CIED pocket hematoma between the heparin bridging group and the direct implantation group .Conclusion Application of HFEE in CIED implantation procedure could reduce the incidence of pocket hematoma , and there was no significant difference in the incidence of pocket hematoma in patients with or without oral anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents.
