Hydroxyapatite-bone morphogenetic protein ossicular prosthesis versus allogeneic cartilage ossicular prosthesis for ossicular chain damage
10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2016.42.009
- VernacularTitle:羟基磷灰石-骨形态发生蛋白复合人工听小骨与同种异体软骨听骨赝复物修复听骨链损伤的比较
- Author:
Xuehong ZHANG
;
Xiaowei LIANG
;
Honglue LU
;
Shujie YU
;
Hongmei WANG
;
Yuli ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- From:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
2016;20(42):6290-6295
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:There is a great dispute on the choice of repair materials for ossicular chain damage.
OBJECTIVE:To explore the effects of new hydroxyapatite-bone morphogenetic protein ossicular prosthesis versus al ogeneic cartilage ossicular prosthesis in patients with ossicular chain damage.
METHODS:Sixty patients with chronic otitis media were equal y assigned into a control group and a test group. Two groups of patients underwent tympanoplasty and ossicular chain reconstruction with al ogeneic cartilage ossicular prosthesis or hydroxyapatite-bone morphogenetic protein ossicular prosthesis, respectively. Twelve months after surgery, fol ow-up results were compared between two groups.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Air conduction value and air-bone gap value were both improved significantly in the two groups after surgery (P<0.05), and especial y, the postoperative air conduction value was better in the test group than the control group (P<0.05). Implant detachment was found in three cases of the control group, whereas did not occur in the test group. Improved hearing was found in 28 cases in the test group with an improvement rate of 93%and 25 cases in the control group with an improvement rate of 83%. There was a significant difference in the hearing improvement between the two groups (P<0.05). Overal , two kinds of prostheses can share similar effects on the ossicular chain repair.
Subject headings:Tympanoplasty;Otitis Media;Bone Morphogenetic Proteins;Tissue Engineering
