Magnifying Endoscopy in Upper Gastrointestinal Tract.
- Author:
Sang Ho LEE
1
;
Chang Beom RYU
;
Jae Young JANG
;
Joo Young CHO
Author Information
1. Department of Internal Medicine, Busan Medical Center, Busan, Korea.
- Publication Type:Review ; English Abstract
- Keywords:
Magnifying endoscopy;
Upper gastrointestinal tract
- MeSH:
Diagnosis, Differential;
Duodenal Diseases/pathology;
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/*methods;
Esophageal Diseases/pathology;
Gastrointestinal Diseases/*pathology;
Humans;
Image Enhancement/*methods;
Stomach Diseases/pathology;
Upper Gastrointestinal Tract/pathology
- From:The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology
2006;48(3):145-155
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
For the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal (GI) lesions, magnification method is usually used in conjunction with chromoscopy, enabling the endoscopist to view subtle mucosal patterns in exquisite detail. Recently published datas have shown that magnifying endoscopy might be a valuable adjunct for the diagnosis, detection, and characterization of inflammatory and neoplastic lesions of the upper GI tract. It is also proven to be an useful surveillance protocol in identifying dysplastic epithelium or early cancer within a segment of Barrett's esophagus. Possible indications for magnifying endoscopy in upper GI tract include screening and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus, defining the extent of esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma, detecting synchronous/metachronous gastric and esophageal cancers, diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection, and recognizing minimal mucosal changes in gastroesophageal reflux disease. By grading the quality of evidence for the currently published trials, it is clear that the majority are case series, case reports, and/or observational studies without randomization, control, or blinding. Moreover, other evidence-based criteria such as independent, blind comparisons of magnifying endoscopy with a standard method which evaluates this technology in an appropriate spectrum of patients to whom the test may be applicable, and standardizing methodology would be crucial before magnifying endoscopy becomes a standard procedure in clinical practice. In the future, a uniform classification system for staining and magnifying patterns should be devised and observer agreement should be tested. Futher studies then could be performed based upon consistent, validated, and standardized terminologies and criteria.
