The comparison of two methods of detecting pepsinogen
10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2016.20.003
- VernacularTitle:2种检测胃蛋白酶原方法的比较
- Author:
Lianying ZHANG
;
Hu XIAO
;
Xu LU
;
Linlin XIAO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
pepsinogen;
GICA methods;
ELISA
- From:
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
2016;37(20):2810-2812
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate colloidal gold immune chromatography (GICA ) and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detection pepsinogen (PG) consistency of results ,so as to provide experimental evidence for the use of colloidal gold im‐munochromatography assay PG and briefly analysis of its clinical utility .Methods Totally 40 cases in our hospital digested samples and medical centers 60 healthy population sample in Endoscopy Center by endoscopy diagnosed with inflammation of the stomach disease ,respectively ,with colloidal gold immune chromatography and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay PG ,colloidal gold immu‐noassay chromatography method to be evaluated ,as the reference ELISA method .The results were compared to the method and bias analysis .Results GICA method with a correlation coefficient ELISA test results were greater than 0 .95 ,indicating a good correla‐tion between the two methods and there is no overall bias;sensitivity and specificity of the two methods were (0 .775 ,0 .85) and (0 .782 ,0 .823) .Conclusion Both GICA and ELISA can be used for screening or diagnosis of stomach illnesses .
