Adhibition of Misoprostol Combined with Palace Cavity Attraction Tube in the Treatment of Painless Abor-tion after Cesarean Section
10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2015.33.08
- VernacularTitle:米索前列醇不同给药方式联合宫腔吸引管在剖宫产术后无痛人流中的应用
- Author:
Jinmei CHEN
;
Yue LI
;
Lie WU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Misoprostol;
Painless abortion;
Palace cavity attraction tube;
Cesarean section
- From:
China Pharmacy
2015;26(33):4631-4633
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To study the adhibition of misoprostol combined with palace cavity attraction tube in the treatment of painless abortion after cesarean section. METHODS:214 patients who received painless abortion after cesarean section were ran-domly divided into group A(71 case),group B(71 case)and group C(72 case). After all patients were given conventional intrave-nous anesthesia,Group A was given misoprostol 0.6 mg for oral administration in preoperative 2 h. Group B was given Misoprostol tablet 0.2 mg abrasive powder put in posterior fornix in preoperative 3 h. Group C did not give any drugs. All the groups used dis-posable suction curettage tube. The efficacies of sedation and cervical dilatation,operation time,intraoperative blood loss,recovery time,dosage of propofol and incidences of complications and adverse reactions in the 3 groups were observed. RESULTS:The op-eration time,intraoperative blood loss in group A were lower than group B and lower than group C,the differences were statistical-ly significant(P<0.05);recovery time and dosage of propofol in group A were lower than group B and C,the differences were sta-tistically significant(P<0.05),howerer,there was no significant difference between group B and C(P>0.05). The total effective rates of sedation and cervical dilatation in group A and B were significantly higher than group C,and the difference was statistical-ly significant(P<0.05),however,there was no significant difference between group A and B(P>0.05). The incidence of compli-cations in group A was lower than group B and lower than group C,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions among 3 groups(P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS:The efficien-cy and safety of misoprostol for oral administration or medicated vaginal suppository combined with palace cavity attraction tube in the treatment of painless abortion after cesarean section is similar,but oral administration can reduce the dosage of anesthetics,op-eration time and smaller intraoperative blood loss volume.
