Efficacy and Safety of Pituitrin Combined with Phentolamine versus Pituitrin Alone in the Treatment of Bron-chiectasis Hemoptysis:A Systematic Review
10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2015.33.26
- VernacularTitle:垂体后叶素联合酚妥拉明对比单用垂体后叶素治疗支气管扩张咯血疗效与安全性的系统评价
- Author:
Xia LONG
;
Guirong XIAO
;
Ting XU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Pituitrin;
Phentolamine;
Bronchiectasis;
Hemoptysis;
Systematic review;
Meta-analysis;
Randomized controlled trial
- From:
China Pharmacy
2015;26(33):4682-4685
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To systematically review the efficacy and safety of pituitrin combined with phentolamine versus pitui-trin alone in the treatment of bronchiectasis hemoptysis(BH),and provide evidence-based reference for the clinical treatment. METHODS:Retrieved from PubMed,Cochrane Library,EMBase,CJFD,Wanfang and VIP database,the randomized controlled trails(RCT)about pituitrin combined with phentolamine(test group)versus pituitrin alone(control group)in the treatment of BH were collected,and afterdata extract and quality evaluation ,Meta-analysis was performed by using Rev Man 5.2.3 statistics soft-ware. RESULTS:A total of 43 RCTs were included,involving 3 094 patients. Results of Meta-analysis showed the significant effi-cacy [RR=1.50,95%CI(1.38,1.62),P<0.001] and effective rate [RR=1.25,95%CI(1.20,1.30),P<0.001] in test group were sig-nificantly higher than control group,inefficacy [RR=0.29,95%CI(0.23,0.36),P<0.001], hemoptysis stopped or remission time [MD=-2.00,95%CI(-2.43,-1.57),P<0.001],incidence of headache [RR=0.36,95%CI(0.22,0.59),P<0.001],incidence of chest tightness [RR=0.41,95%CI(0.26,0.63),P<0.001],incidence of abdominal pain [RR=0.26,95%CI(0.16,0.43),P<0.001] and incidence of elevated blood pressure [RR=0.28,95%CI(0.14,0.56),P<0.001] in test group were significantly lower than control group,there were significant differences in 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS:Pituitrin combined with phentolamine has better efficacy and safety than pituitrin alone in the treatment of BH. Due to the limit of methodological quality and sample size,it re-mains to be further verified with more rigorously designed and long-term follow-up of large-scale RCT.
