Analysis on Monochrome LCDs with Different Resolutions and the Value of Clinical Application
10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2010.02.028
- VernacularTitle:不同分辨率单色液晶显示器与临床应用价值的分析
- Author:
Jiandong YIN
;
Yang HONG
;
Xianzheng SHA
;
Qiyong GUO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
resolution;
nodule;
markings;
monochrome display
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Physics
2010;27(2):1810-1813
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: Evaluate the influence of monochrome LCDs with different resolutions for the quality of detail imaging and detection performance of lesions. Methods: 93 DR chest images were selected from PACS on-line, including 38 positive cases, 32 suspected cases and 23 normal cases. The positive cases were divided into two groups A and B according the diameter of pulmonary nodules. Three of high-, mid-and low-experienced radiologists interpreted the 93 images on three types of displays independently. Each observer marked their confidence of the presence of pulmonary nodule with five-point rating scale : (1)definitely absent, (2)probably absent, (3)possibly present, (4)probably present and (5)definitely present, and the visual quality of lung markings with three-point rating scale:(1) excellent, (2)free, (3) inferior. Software SPSS 13.0 was used to analyze the results. Results: For the detection performance of lesion, while detecting nodules of Group A, the areas under ROC curves were 0.643、0.686、0.739 on 2MP、3MP and 3MP display for high-experienced radiologist. Those were 0.636、0.682、0.717 for mid-experienced radiologist and 0.623、0.656、0.721 for low-experienced radiologist; while detecting nodules of Group B, those were 0.813、0.832、0.846 for high-experienced d radiologist, 0.773、0.824、0.838 for mid-experienced radiologist and 0.763、 0.7.73、0.833 for low-experienced radiologist. There were no significant differences among detection performance ofradiodiagnostic systems. For the quality of detail imaging, while interpreting the visualization of lung markings, the difference between high-and mid-experienced radiologist or between high-and low-experienced radiologist on 5MP display was conspicuous (P<0.05). But the differences of other comparisons did not reach the significant level. Conclusions: For the detection performance ofpulmouary nodules, it is comparable among different radiodiagnostic systems; for the visualization of lung markings, high-experienced radiologist could get more information on 5MP display.
