Effects of propofol versus urapidil on perioperative hemodynamics during tracheal extubation in patients with gallbladder operation
10.11659/jjssx.1672-5042.201401020
- VernacularTitle:异丙酚和乌拉地尔对胆囊手术患者气管拔管过程血流动力学的作用
- Author:
Yongchong CHENG
;
Xiaobin CHENG
;
Changtai XU
;
Lixian XU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
propofol;
urapidil;
tracheal intubation;
gallbladder operation;
general anesthesia
- From:
Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery
2014;(1):53-55
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To observe effects of propofol versus urapidil on perioperative hemodynamics in patients with gallbladder opera-tion during tracheal extubation. Methods From 2010 January to 2012 December, 128 patients who were diagnosed by color B ultra /CT and then underwent gallbladder selective operation (ASAⅡ~IV) were selected, and they were divided into the propofol group (n=64) and the urapidil group (n=64). At the end of operation, patients of the two groups were given intravenous injection of propofol 1. 5 mg/kg and ura-pidil 2. 5mg/kg which were diluted with normal saline to 8 mL respectively. Sputum suction immediately after medication, and then wiped out the endotracheal tube and gave oxygen masks for 10 min. Record the systolic/diastolic blood pressure ( SBP/DSP) , heart rate ( HR) , pH, PaO2 , PaCO2 and SaO2 under double blind trial before induction, after medication, at the time of sputum suction, at the time of extuba-tion, 5 min after extubation and 10 min after extubation. At the same time, agitation during the extubation period and patients awake time were recorded. Results After extubation, cough (4. 7% vs. 26. 6%), agitation (3. 1% vs. 17. 2%) and glossoptosis (12. 5% vs. 21. 9%) in propofol group was significantly lower than urapidil group (P<0. 05). SBP/DSP and heart rate of propofol group and urapidil group were significantly increased (P<0. 05) before induction, after medication, at the time of sputum suction, at the time of extubation, 5 minafter extubation and 10 min after extubation. The recovery time of propofol group and urapidil group were of no significant differences (P>0. 05). During perioperation extubation, there was no significantly difference in terms of changes of pH, PaO2, PaCO2 and SaO2 be-tween the groups (P>0. 05). Conclusion Propofol is better than urapidil in preventing adverse effect of extubation for patients with gall-bladder operation, and it will not affect the recovery time of patients.
