The effect of photon energy on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for prostate cancer.
10.3857/roj.2012.30.1.27
- Author:
Wonmo SUNG
;
Jong Min PARK
;
Chang Heon CHOI
;
Sung Whan HA
;
Sung Joon YE
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy;
Prostate cancer;
Photon energy;
Treatment planning;
Integral dose
- MeSH:
Head;
Humans;
Neutrons;
Organs at Risk;
Prostate;
Prostatic Neoplasms;
Retrospective Studies
- From:Radiation Oncology Journal
2012;30(1):27-35
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of common three photon energies (6-MV, 10-MV, and 15-MV) on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans to treat prostate cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with prostate cancer treated locally to 81.0 Gy were retrospectively studied. 6-MV, 10-MV, and 15-MV IMRT plans for each patient were generated using suitable planning objectives, dose constraints, and 8-field setting. The plans were analyzed in terms of dose-volume histogram for the target coverage, dose conformity, organs at risk (OAR) sparing, and normal tissue integral dose. RESULTS: Regardless of the energies chosen at the plans, the target coverage, conformity, and homogeneity of the plans were similar. However, there was a significant dose increase in rectal wall and femoral heads for 6-MV compared to those for 10-MV and 15-MV. The V20 Gy of rectal wall with 6-MV, 10-MV, and 15-MV were 95.6%, 88.4%, and 89.4% while the mean dose to femoral heads were 31.7, 25.9, and 26.3 Gy, respectively. Integral doses to the normal tissues in higher energy (10-MV and 15-MV) plans were reduced by about 7%. Overall, integral doses in mid and low dose regions in 6-MV plans were increased by up to 13%. CONCLUSION: In this study, 10-MV prostate IMRT plans showed better OAR sparing and less integral doses than the 6-MV. The biological and clinical significance of this finding remains to be determined afterward, considering neutron dose contribution.