Comparative study of clinical effect on open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy treatment for small renal cell carcinoma
10.11659/jjssx.01E015056
- VernacularTitle:后腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗小肾癌的临床效果研究
- Author:
Zonglan XIE
;
Chuanjiang DONG
;
Ziqiang DONG
;
Lusheng ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
renal carcinoma;
open partial nephrectomy;
laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
- From:
Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery
2015;24(6):634-636
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the safety and clinical effect of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy ( LPN) on small renal cell carcino-ma. Methods The records of 65 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy in our hospital from March 2008 to March 2013 were retrospec-tively analyzed. 35 patients were given open partial nephrectomy and the other 30 patients were given LPN. Compared the operative time,blood loss,warm ischemia time,length of stay,positive marginrate,and occurance rate of complications between the two groups. Results There was no statistical difference in the mean size of tumor in the two groups. Compared to the OPN group,there was less blood loss,operative time, hospital stays and warm ischemia time in the LPN group. There was neither positive surgical margin nor renal function damage in the two groups. And during the follow-up period ranged from 6 to 18 months,there was no local recurrence. Conclusion Laparoscopic partial ne-phrectomy has a shorter operation time,less blood loss,shorter length of hospital stay compared with open partial nephrectomy,and it wouldn 't extend the time of warm ischemia,while the clinical effect of the two methods are similar.
