Risk factors and molecular epidemiology of community-onset, multidrug resistance extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli infections.
- Author:
So Yeon PARK
1
;
Cheol In KANG
;
Yu Mi WI
;
Doo Ryeon CHUNG
;
Kyong Ran PECK
;
Nam Yong LEE
;
Jae Hoon SONG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Drug resistance, multiple; Extended-spectrum β-lactamase; Escherichia coli; Community-onset infection
- MeSH: Drug Resistance, Multiple*; Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field; Epidemiology; Escherichia coli Infections*; Escherichia coli*; Escherichia*; Fluoroquinolones; Gentamicins; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Molecular Epidemiology*; Public Health; Risk Factors*; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination
- From:The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2017;32(1):146-157
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although multidrug resistance (MDR) among extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) poses significant therapeutic challenges, little is known regarding the risk factors and epidemiology of community-onset MDR-ESBL-EC infections. We performed this study to investigate risk factors and the molecular epidemiology of community-onset MDR-ESBL-EC infections. METHODS: We conducted a case-control-control study of community-onset infections. MDR-ESBL-EC was defined as ESBL-EC that demonstrated in vitro resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, fluoroquinolones (FQs), and gentamicin. Patients with MDR-ESBL-EC infections were designated as case patients. A control group I (CG I) patient was defined as a person whose clinical sample yielded ESBL-EC that did not meet the criteria for MDR. A control group II (CG II) patient was defined as a patient with a non-ESBL-EC infection. RESULTS: Of 108 patients with ESBL-EC infections, 30 cases (27.8%) were due to MDR-ESBL-EC. Compared with CG I, prior use of FQs (odds ratio [OR], 3.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11 to 8.98) and immunosuppressant use (OR, 10.47; 95% CI, 1.07 to 102.57) were significantly associated with MDR-ESBL-EC. Compared with CG II, prior use of FQs (OR, 15.53; 95% CI, 2.86 to 84.27) and healthcare-associated infection (OR, 5.98; 95% CI, 2.26 to 15.86) were significantly associated with MDR-ESBL-EC. CTX-M-15 was the most common in MDR-ESBL-EC infections (59.1% [13/22]), while CTX-M-14 was the most common in non-MDR-ESBL-EC infections (41.6% [32/77]). CTX-M-15 was significantly associated with MDR-ESBL-EC (59.1% vs. 32.5%, p = 0.028). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis showed clonal diversity of MDR-ESBL-EC isolates. CONCLUSIONS: The emergence of strains of MDR-ESBL-EC in the community poses an important new public health threat. More information on the emergence and transmission of these strains will be necessary in order to prevent their spread.
