Comparison of Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection Rates by Perineal Care Agents in Intensive Care Units.
- Author:
Ihnsook JEONG
1
;
Soonmi PARK
;
Jae Sim JEONG
;
Duck Sun KIM
;
Young Sun CHOI
;
Young Soon LEE
;
Young Mi PARK
Author Information
1. Associate Professor, College of Nursing, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea. jeongis@pusan.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
detergents;
perineum;
urinary catheterization;
urinary tract infections
- MeSH:
Adult;
Anti-Bacterial Agents;
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.);
Consciousness;
Delivery of Health Care;
Detergents;
Fecal Incontinence;
Fever;
Humans;
Incidence;
Critical Care;
Intensive Care Units;
Perineum;
Povidone-Iodine;
Skin;
Urinary Catheterization;
Urinary Catheters;
Urinary Tract;
Urinary Tract Infections
- From:Asian Nursing Research
2010;4(3):142-150
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: This study compared the catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) rates resulting from the use of four perineal care agents (soap-and-water, skin cleansing foam, 10% povidone-iodine, and normal saline) among patients in intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: This four-group experimental study was done with 97 adult patients who had urinary catheters over 2 days in three ICUs between April and July 2008. The patients received one of the four types of perineal care. Data collected included the incidence of CAUTI at baseline (prior to perineal care) and 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after beginning perineal care. Patients were divided into UTI and non-UTI groups based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network UTI definition to calculate incidence rates. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by Cox's proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of CAUTIs per 100 urinary catheter days were 3.18 episodes during 1 week with urinary catheter, 3.31 during 2 weeks, and 3.04 during 4 weeks. No statistically significant difference in hazard ratios of CAUTIs for each perineal care agent was evident with reference to soap-and-water at 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after beginning perineal care after controlling for age, use of antibiotics, fecal incontinence, consciousness level, fever, and diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The type of perineal care does not influence the incidence of CAUTIs. Further confirmatory studies with a larger patient population should be conducted, as well as determining perineal agent preference.
