Mechanical device for prevention of deep vein thrombosis on patient compliance:a meta-analysis based on observational studies
10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2016.35.020
- VernacularTitle:机械装置预防深静脉血栓形成依从性：基于观察性研究的Meta分析
- Author:
Yu XIE
;
Chenghuan ZHANG
;
Yun LIU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- From:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
2016;20(35):5304-5312
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Compliance of mechanical device reduced in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis.
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the compliance on mechanical prevention measures in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis, and to analyze the reason for compliance reduction.
METHODS:We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Medline for articles on compliance of inpatients on mechanical device for prevention of deep vein thrombosis published from inception to December 2015. At the same time, the“snowbal”method was used to screen the references. After the literatures were screened, using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale tools and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality standard, two researchers evaluated the quality of the literatures independently and strictly. Data were extracted if meet the discharge standard. The software of Meta-analyst Beta3.13 was used for heterogeneity analysis and publication bias test in the extracted data. According to the heterogeneity analysis results and literature types, a reasonable statistical analysis method was selected to col ate, summarize and discuss.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Final y, 12 papers were included, 9 of which were cross-sectional studies, 2 cohort studies, and 1 case-control study. The odds ratio about compliance rate of inpatients with mechanical devices was 53.2%(95%CI:38.7-67.2). Subgroup analysis showed that the odds ratio about compliance rate of pneumatic compression devices was 54.9%(95%CI:34.9-73.4). The odds ratio about compliance rate on elastic stockings was 47.9%(95%CI:34.3-61.8). The detection of mechanical device of surgical patients showed that odds ratio about compliance rate was 66.8%(95%CI:47.4-81.7). Our results confirm that the compliance rate of the use of mechanical devices for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis in clinical inpatients requests to be improved. The reason for reduced compliance rate should be further investigated to improve the compliance rate.
