Delphi Evaluation and Analysis of the Results of Perfume Pouch Wearing Method in Practice Guidelines to Prevent Disease for Recurrent Respiratory Tract Infections in Children Prevented ;by Sachet-Therapy
10.3969/j.issn.1005-5304.2016.09.006
- VernacularTitle:《药物香佩疗法预防小儿反复呼吸道感染治未病实践指南》香囊佩戴方法的德尔菲法评价和结果分析
- Author:
Chenfei SONG
;
Zheng XUE
;
Mengjiao LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
perfume pouch wearing methods;
recurrent respiratory tract infections in children;
practice guidelines to prevent disease;
Delphi method
- From:
Chinese Journal of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine
2016;23(9):23-27
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate and screen the concentration and coordination degree of the opinions of the experts in TCM pediatrics on the preventive method of Practice Guidelines to Prevent Disease for Recurrent Respiratory Tract Infections in Children Prevented by Sachet-Therapy;To formulate scientific and practical methods for perfume pouch wearing in this book. Methods Delphi method was applied to this research. All questionnaires were designed based on the literature research and distributed to more than 30 experts for 3 rounds. And the results in the first two rounds of survey were analyzed. Results Totally 31 and 33 valid questionnaires were received in the first and second time respectively. The experts’ activity index was 88.6% and 93.4% respectively. The perfume pouch wearing methods of Practice Guidelines to Prevent Disease for Recurrent Respiratory Tract Infections in Children Prevented by Sachet-Therapy was set down. And most of the experts shared a positive view on the concentration and coordination degree of this book. Conclusion The experts’ opinions upon this draft are quite positive. The experts are from all over China, and they are quite professional, with representativeness. The perfume pouch wearing methods of Practice Guidelines to Prevent Disease for Recurrent Respiratory Tract Infections in Children Prevented by Sachet-Therapy are generally recognized by the experts. However, there are still some different ideas in terms of some indexes, which need to be further discussed.
