Clinical analysis in prone and supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (report of 356 cases)
10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2016.15.020
- VernacularTitle:俯卧位与平卧位在经皮肾镜碎石取石术中的临床分析
- Author:
Dong LV
;
Xiang HUANG
;
Ke DOU
;
Yin XIANG
;
Xuhui WAN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy;
Puncture position;
Stone
- From:
The Journal of Practical Medicine
2016;32(15):2486-2488
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different puncture positions in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Methods Three hundred fifty-six patients who underwent PCNL were analyzed from March 2012 to October 2015. The passage caliber was 16F-20F. There were 217 cases in prone position and 139 cases in supine position. Results The successful operation in PCNL was 354 cases , while the remaining 2 cases were performed by open surgery. The primary stone clearance rate was 75.5%. The additional PCNLs were performed in 23 cases, and 63 cases of residual calculi were treated by ESWL. 11 patients were treated due to infection or bleeding by the additional PCNLs. There were 3 cases with massive hemorrhage which were treated by Interventional embolization therapy , 12 cases in postoperative fever , no renal resection , no intestinal injury, no deaths. There was no significant difference in stone clearance rate and complication rate between the two groups. Conclusion The puncture position of PCNL can be optional based on the stone size , stone location, degree of hydronephrosis ,and patient′s cardiopulmonary condition individually.
