Comparative Study for Effects of Bare-handed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitator in Emergency Treatment
10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2016.07.012
- VernacularTitle:徒手心肺复苏与心肺复苏机在急诊科应用的疗效比较
- Author:
Tao WANG
;
Jian QIN
;
Changyuan WANG
;
Zheng WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation;
Effect
- From:
Chinese Circulation Journal
2016;31(7):673-675
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To compare the effects of bare-handed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and cardiopulmonary resuscitator in emergency treatment. Methods: A total of 185 patients received CPR in our hospital from 2013-01 to 2015-10 were enrolled. The patients were divided into 2 groups: Bare-handed CPR (Bare-handed ) group, n=101 and Cardiopulmonary resuscitator (Mechanical) group, n=84;meanwhile, taking 30 min as border time, each group was further divided as short time CPR subgroup and long time CPR subgroup. High quality CPR was conducted in all patients. The success rates, time and blood levels of lactic acid after CPR were compared among short time subgroup, long time subgroup between Bare-handed group and Mechanical group respectively. Results: For short time CPR patients, the success rates, time and blood levels of lactic acid after CPR were similar between Bare-handed group and Mechanical group; for long term CPR patients, the success rates and time were similar between Bare-handed group and Mechanical group, while blood levels of lactic acid after CPR in Mechanical group (6.88 ± 1.82) mmol/L was lower than Bare-handed group (9.39 ± 2.39) mmol/L, P<0.05. Conclusion: The success rates of bare-handed CPR and mechanical CPR were similar for emergency treatment, both methods were effective; while mechanical CPR may save the manual labor, achieve better metabolic result which should be recommended in clinical practice.
