Comparison of accuracy of SVV, CVP and PAWP in monitoring changes in blood volume in patients undergoing renal transplantation
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1416.2016.05.024
- VernacularTitle:SVV、CVP和PAWP监测肾移植术患者容量变化准确性的比较
- Author:
Sijie YIN
;
Jingguang LIANG
;
Ting GONG
;
Yanjie ZOU
;
Zhongping CAO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Stroke volume;
Central venous pressure;
Pulmonary wedge pressure;
Vascular capacitance;
Kidney transplantation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
2016;36(5):598-601
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the accuracy of stroke volume variation (SVV),central venous pressure (CVP) and puhnonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP) in monitoring the changes in blood volume in the patients undergoing renal transplantation.Methods Sixteen patients with chronic renal failure,of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅱ or Ⅲ,aged 18-55 yr,scheduled for elective allograft renal transplantation under general anesthesia,were enrolled in the study.SVV was continuously monitored with the FloTrac/Vigileo monitor,and CVP,PAWP and stroke volume index (SVI) were continuously monitored with the volumetric pulmonary artery catheter during surgery.The parameters of hemodynamics were recorded at 30 min after induction of anesthesia,5 min before renal artery opening,5 and 30 min after renal artery opening,and at the end of surgery.Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 electrolyte solution 6 ml/kg was infused over 15 min via the central venous catheter to perform fluid responsiveness starting from 30 min after induction of anesthesia.Positive fluid responsiveness was defined as the change in SVI ≥ 15％.The relationship between SVV and CVP and between SVV and PAWP was analyzed using the Pearson correlation analysis.The receiver operating characteristic curve for CVP,SVV and PAWP in monitoring the changes in blood volume was drawn,and the area under the curve was calculated.Results Compared with the value at 5 min before renal artery opening,SVV was significantly increased after renal artery opening (P＜0.05),and no significant change was found in CVP and PAWP after renal artery opening (P＞0.05).SVV was negatively correlated with CVP,and r=-0.82 (P＜0.01);SVV was negatively correlated with PAWP,and r=-0.77 (P＜0.01).The area under the curve of SVV in monitoring the changes in blood volume was 0.87,and of CVP and PAWP was 0.69 and 0.66,respectively.Conclusion SVV provides better accuracy than CVP and PAWP in monitoring the changes in blood volume in the patients undergoing renal transplantation.
