Dosimetry and efficacy between RapidArc and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2016.07.007
- VernacularTitle:容积旋转调强与固定野调强在晚期宫颈癌放疗的剂量学比较及疗效观察
- Author:
Xiaomei SUN
;
Lijuan DING
;
Lihua DONG
;
Qin ZHAO
;
Lixin MA
;
Yaqin QU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cervical neoplasms;
RapidArc;
Intensity modulated radiotherapy;
Acute side effects
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
2016;36(7):509-512
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the difference of dosimetry and evaluate clinical efficacy and acute toxicity reaction between RapidArc and fixed gantry angle dynamic intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in advanced cervical carcinoma.Methods A total of 43 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer were studied,including 22 patients treated with RapidArc and 21 patients with IMRT.All plans were prescribed 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions.The conformity index and homogeneity index of the targets,the monitor units(MUs) and delivery time were compared.Incidence of acute intestinal and bladder side effects and rates of efficacy were calculated.Results The conformity index of RapidArc was better compared to IMRT.The V40 and V50 of bladder and V30,V40 and V50 of rectum planned by RapidArc was significantly lower than that by IMRT(t =-2.386,-2.397,P ＜0.05;t =-5.525,-2.883,-2.686,P ＜0.05).The mean dose of femoral head planned by RapidArc was also significantly lower (t =-2.395,P ＜ 0.05).For RapidArc,mean MU and treatment time were reduced by 53.15％,and 62.14％,respectively.There was no difference in the incidence of acute intestinal and bladder toxicity and rates of complete remission and efficacy between the two groups.Conclusions In dosimetric analysis,RapidArc showed advantage in protecting organs at risk and reducing treatment time in radical radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
