Curative effect analysis of arthroscopic transtibial single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament residual reconstruction using artificial ligament compared with hamstring tendon autograft
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6315.2016.05.003
- VernacularTitle:人工韧带与自体腘绳肌腱保残重建后交叉韧带的疗效分析
- Author:
Bin LI
;
Yanfang WANG
;
Chuang QIU
;
Lunhao BAI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Posterior cruciate ligament;
Arthroscopy;
LARS artificial ligament;
Hamstring tendon
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2016;32(5):393-397
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the curative effect of arthroscopic transtibial single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament(PCL) reconstruction using LARS artificial ligament and hamstring tendon autograft.Methods Thirty-seven patients who underwent isolated single-bundle PCL reconstruction with remnant preservation technique were evaluated.They were divided into LARS group(n=19) and 4-strand hamstring tendon autograft (4SHG) group (n =18).Minimum follow-up was 2 years.Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at the latest follow-up with several parameters,including the international knee documentation committee(IKDC) score,Lysholm knee score,Tegner activity rating and physical examination.Results After operation,in LARS group,Lysholm sorce was 89 (51,100) points,Tegner sorce was 6 (1,9) points,IKDC sorces were normal of 5 cases,nearly normal of 10 cases,abnormal of 3 cases,and obviously abnormal of 1 case,significantly improved compared with before operation (62 (28,98) points,2 (1,5) points,abnormal IKDC score of 8 cases,obviously abnormal of 11 cases;P＜0.001).In 4SHG group,Lysholm sorce was 84(36,100) points,Tegner sorce was 6(1,9) points,IKDC sorces were normal of 5 cases,nearly normal of 9 cases,abnormal of 3 cases,and obviously abnormal of 1 case,better than before operation (64 (28,98) points,2 (1,5) points,IKDC score abnormal of 8 cases,obviously abnormal of 10 cases;P＜0.001).There was significant difference about Lysholm sorce between two groups after operation (P=0.037).The drawer test results show that,after operation,there were 15 case of grade 0,4 cases of grade 1 in LARS group,3 cases of grade 0,11 cases of grade 1,4 cases of grade 2 in 4SHG group,all improved significantly compared with before operation,and the differences were statistically significant(LARS group:x2 =38.000,P＜0.001;4SHG group:x2 =29.143,P＜0.001),and the grade of patients in LARS group were superior to 4SHG group after operation (x2 =15.251,P ＜0.001).Conclusion The clinical effect of using a LARS ligament for PCL reconstruction is more useful than using a 4SHG.
