Quantitative analyses on the fund theses in the Journal of Practical Radiology and Chinese Journal of Radiology
10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2016.07.039
- VernacularTitle:《实用放射学杂志》与《中华放射学杂志》基金论文定量分析
- Author:
Guanglin LI
;
Shunzhi LIU
;
Youmin GUO
;
Guihua ZHUANG
;
Junle YANG
;
Xiaoqiang HUANG
;
Dingjun HAO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
fund theses;
ratio of fund theses;
data statistic;
quantitative analysis;
bibliometrics
- From:
Journal of Practical Radiology
2016;32(7):1137-1141
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To quantitatively analyze the fund theses published in the Journal of Practical Radiology(JPR)and Chinese Journal of Radiology(CJR)in order to detect effective approaches to the improvement of the journal quality and academic level of the JPR.Methods The number of funds-supported theses published,the ratio of fund theses,grade,regional,source of institutions and publication time-lag distribution of the fund theses were statistically analyzed by using bibliometrics in the two journals in 2013.Re-sults Six hundred and eighteen theses were published in JPR in 2013,the total number of fund theses were 137(accounted for 22.2% of total articles),the ratio of fund theses were 0.22,the provincial and municipal fund theses accounted for 59.2%.All fund theses were from 23 regions and 82 institutions throughout the country.The average of publication time-lag was 235.6 days.Three hundred and thirteen theses were published in CJR in 2013,the total number of fund theses were 97(accounted for 31.0% of total articles),the ratio of fund theses were 0.31,the provincial and municipal fund theses accounted for 32.0%.All fund theses were from 18 regions and 70 institutions throughout the country.The average of publication time-lag was 228.4 days.Conclusion JPR has its own superi-ority,meanwhile,it also has a significant disparity and insufficiency comparing to CJR.In order to further promote the quality conno-tations and the academic level of JPR,efforts should be made on subject selection and planning,initiative collection of manuscripts, priority publishment to excellent manuscripts,shortening publication time-lag,etc.Additionally,a database of core authors and ex-perts should be established.
