Recurrence Rate after Herniotomy only versus Discectomy in Lumbar Disc Herniation.
10.14245/kjs.2013.10.4.227
- Author:
Jong Soo PARK
1
;
Sang Eun CHOI
;
Tae Koo CHO
;
Sang Hyuk KIM
;
Wootack RHEE
;
Woo Jae KIM
;
Seong Il HA
;
Jae Hyeon LIM
;
Il Tae JANG
Author Information
1. Department of Neurosurgery, Thejoeun Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Lumbar Vertebrae;
Herniated Disc;
Diskectomy;
Recurrence
- MeSH:
Case-Control Studies;
Diskectomy*;
Humans;
Incidence;
Intervertebral Disc Displacement;
Interviews as Topic;
Lumbar Vertebrae;
Random Allocation;
Recurrence*;
Reoperation;
Retrospective Studies
- From:Korean Journal of Spine
2013;10(4):227-231
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) recurrence necessitating reoperation can pose problems following spinal surgery, with an overall reported incidence of approximately (3-13%). The purpose of this study is to identify the rate of recurrent disc herniation, to discuss the radiologic indications for herniotomy and to analyze clinical outcomes compared with conventional discectomy. METHODS: This study is a retrospective case control study. The authors retrospectively reviewed 114 patients who underwent herniotomy & conventional discectomy by a single surgeon for single-level LDH between June 2009 and May 2012. Herniotomy group was 57 patients and conventional discectomy group was 57 patients that were selected from 631 patients using stratified randomization. Evaluation for LDH recurrence included detailed medical chart and radiologic review and telephone interview. Postoperative VAS and the Korean version of ODI were examined one week after surgery. Clinical outcome was investigated according to Odom's criteria from three months to three years. RESULTS: Of the 114 patients for whom the authors were able to definitively assess symptomatic recurrence status, four patients (7%) experienced LDH recurrence following single-level herniotomy and three patients (5.2%) conventional discectomy. There were no differences in the VAS and Korean version of ODI between herniotomy group and conventional discectomy group. The herniotomy group had better results than the conventional discectomy group in clinical outcome from three months to three years, but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in clinical outcome between herniotomy and conventional discectomy. Recurrence rates following herniotomy for LDH compare favorably with those in patients who have undergone conventional discectomy, lending further support for its effectiveness in treating herniotomy.
