Comparison of three different flow cytometers in the clinical assessment of lymphocyte subsets
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-9158.2016.05.008
- VernacularTitle:不同流式细胞分析仪检测淋巴细胞亚群的比较研究
- Author:
Weiwei WANG
;
Di XI
;
Xiangliang YUAN
;
Lisong SHEN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Flow cytometry;
Comparative study;
Lymphocyte subsets;
Diagnostic equipment
- From:
Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
2016;39(5):361-365
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the consistency and accuracy among 3 brands of flow cytometers (BriCyte E6,BD FACSCanto Ⅱ and Beckman Coulter FC 500) in the detection of lymphocyte subsets.Methods According to the methodology,the BriCyte E6 was compared with 2 flow cytometers commonly used in clinical detection.Seventy-three cases (40 male and 33 female) of anticoagulation peripheral blood specimens were collected in the clinical laborartory department of Xinhua Hospital in July 2015 and the percentage (％) and absolute number (#) of the lymphocyte subsets were detected by 3 different flow cytometers within samples collected 4 h.Results There were good consistency among the 3 flow cytometers (R2 ＞0.95,R2 from 0.969 5 to 0.992 4) in the detection of lymphocyte subsets percentage,so did in the detection of absolute number (R2 ＞ 0.95,R2 from 0.969 1 to 0.993 3).As to the precision evaluation,in the detectionof CD8％,T#,CD4+ T# and CD8+ T#,BriCyte E6 achieved a low CV％ compared with FACSCanto Ⅱ and FC 500 (Friedman statistics are 16.720,11.840,15.760 and 15.430,P =0.000 2,0.027,0.000 4,0.000 4,respectively).In the detection of T％,CD4％,NK％,B％,NK#,B#,there was no significant difference among the 3 flow cytometers (Friedman statistics are 4.242,3.916,0.852,2.595,1.835 and 0.578,P =0.119 9,0.141 2,0.653 2,0.273 3,0.399 6,0.749 0,respectively).Conclusions The 3 flow cytometers have a good consistency in the detection of lymphocyte subsets.BriCyte E6 may be an alternative or complement of existing flow cytometers.
