The clinical research of suprapubic small cut method combined with transurethral resection prostate on the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia complicated with bladder stones
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6315.2016.04.012
- VernacularTitle:耻骨上小切口膀胱切开取石联合经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生症合并膀胱结石的临床研究
- Author:
Weijia WU
;
Xinhui XIA
;
Mei LI
;
Caihui HUANG
;
Haiyang JIANG
;
Hanxiong ZHENG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Suprapubic small cut method;
Transurethral resection prostate;
Benign prostatic hyperplasia;
Bladder stones
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2016;32(4):328-331
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the clinical effect of suprapubic small cut method combined with transurethral resection prostate(TURP) on the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) complicated with bladder stones.Methods Sixty patients with BPH complicated with bladder stones ≥ 3 cm in the People's Hospital of Futian Affiliated to Guangdong Medical College from January 2013 to September 2014 were selected as the study group,and another 60 patients with BPH complicated with bladder stones<3 cm during the same period were selected as the control group.The cases in the study group were treated with suprapubic small cut method combined with TURP,and the cases in control group were treated with transurethral method combined with TURP.The intraoperative indicators (including the time used for crushed stone,total operation time,blood loss,conversion to laparotomy,blood transfusion and bladder perforation),residual bladder stones and complications of postoperative were compared.Results The operations of the two groups of patients were successfully,and there was no conversion to laparotomy and either bladder perforation.The stone removal time and total operative time of patients of the study group were shorter than of the control group,the difference was statistically significant((12.20±3.55) min vs.(24.05±7.68) min,(62.31± 10.49) min vs.(82.46± 16.75)min;t =10.849,7.897;P<0.001).The intraoperative blood loss and the cases of blood transfusion of patients of the study group were less than the control group,but the prevalence of urinary tract infection were higher(6vs.4),but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Residual stones were more commonly in the control group than in the study group (study group:0,control group:6 cases),the difference was statistically significant(x2 =6.316,P=0.012).Conclusion BPH complicated with bladder stones can be treated by the suprapubic small cut method combined with TURP or transurethral method combined with TURP,but suprapubic small cut method combined with TURP is safer and more effective,which is worthy of popularization and application in clinic.