Metabolic risk and nutritional state according to breakfast energy level of Korean adults: Using the 2007~2009 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
- Author:
So Hyoun JANG
1
;
Yoon Suk SUH
;
Young Jin CHUNG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Korean adult; breakfast energy level; metabolic risk; nutritional state
- MeSH: Adult*; Body Mass Index; Breakfast*; Cholesterol; Chronic Disease; Dyslipidemias; Ear; Education; Eggs; Energy Intake; Humans; Korea; Linear Models; Logistic Models; Male; Meat; Nutrition Surveys*; Obesity; Ovum; Seasons; Snacks; Vegetables; Waist Circumference
- From:Journal of Nutrition and Health 2015;48(1):46-57
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
- Abstract: PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine an appropriate energy level of breakfast with less risk of chronic disease for Korean adults. METHODS: Using data from the 2007~2009 Korean National Health & Nutrition Examination Survey, from a total of 12,238 adults aged 19~64, the final 7,769 subjects were analyzed except subjects who were undergoing treatment for cancer or metabolic disorder. According to the percent of breakfast energy intake versus their estimated energy requirement (EER), the subjects were divided into four groups: < 10% (very low, VL), 10~20% (low, L), 20~30% (moderate, M), > or = 30% (sufficient, S). All data were analyzed on the metabolic risk and nutritional state after application of weighted value and adjustment of sex, age, residential area, income, education, job or jobless, and energy intake using a general linear model or logistic regression. RESULTS: The subjects of group S were 16.9% of total subjects, group M 39.2%, group L 37.6%, and group VL 6.3%. The VL group included more male subjects, younger-aged (19 to 40 years), urban residents, higher income, higher education, and fewer breakfasts eaters together with family members. Among the 4 groups, the VL group showed the highest waist circumference, while the S group showed the lowest waist circumference, body mass index, and serum total cholesterol. The groups of VL and L with lower intake of breakfast energy showed high percent of energy from protein and fat, and low percent of energy from carbohydrate. With the increase of breakfast energy level, intake of energy, most nutrients and food groups increased, and the percentage of subjects consuming nutrients below EAR decreased. The VL group showed relatively higher intake of snacks, sugar, meat and eggs, oil, and seasonings, and the lowest intake of vegetable. Risk of obesity by waist circumference was highest in the VL group by 1.90 times of the S group and the same trend was shown in obesity by BMI. Risk of dyslipidemia by serum total cholesterol was 1.84 times higher in the VL group compared to the S group. Risk of diabetes by Glu-FBS (fasting blood sugar) was 1.57 times higher in the VL group compared to the S group. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that higher breakfast energy level is positively related to lower metabolic risk and more desirable nutritional state in Korean adults. Therefore, breakfast energy intake more than 30% of their own EER would be highly recommended for Korean adults.
