System Review of Acupotomy Treatment for Stenosing Tenovaginitis of Flexor Digitorum
10.3969/j.issn.1005-5304.2016.07.012
- VernacularTitle:针刀治疗屈指肌腱狭窄性腱鞘炎系统评价
- Author:
Jiwei ZHANG
;
Sumin JIANG
;
Haibo WU
;
Hongsheng ZHAN
;
Dongyu CHEN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
acupotomy treatment;
local blocking;
stenosing tenovaginitis of flexor digitorum;
system review;
meta-analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine
2016;23(7):46-50
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy of acupotomy treatment for the stenosing tenovaginitis of flexor digitorum.Methods Articles about RCTs of acupotomy treatment and local blocking for the treatment of stenosing tenovaginitis of flexor digitorum were retrieved from CBM, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang database, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library. And then according to the requirement of Cochrane Handbook for Systemetic Reviews 5.1.0, two reviewers independently chose tests, extracted data, had a cross check, accessed methodological qualities and finally used RevMan 5.3 software for Meta analysis. The total effective rate, cure rate and improvement rate of acupotomy treatment and local blocking in treating stenosing tenovaginitis of flexor digitorum were assessed by using odds ratio (OR).Results Totally 10 articles involving 1426 cases were included. The cure rate in acupotomy treatment group was higher than that of local blocking group [OR=13.11 (95% CI: 8.23–20.89),Z=10.83 (P<0.000 01)], funnel plot Begg’s testP=0.858, Egger’s testP=0.579; the improvement rate of local blocking rate was higher than that of acupotomy treatment group [OR=0.14 (95% CI: 0.10–0.19),Z=11.60 (P<0.000 01)], funnel plot Begg’s test P=1.000, Egger’s testP=0.926; the total effective rate of acupotomy treatment group was higher than that of local blocking group [OR=18.26 (95% CI: 9.95–33.50),Z=9.38 (P<0.000 01)], funnel plot Begg’s testP=0.592, Egger’s testP=0.936.Conclusion Acupotomy treatment for stenosing tenovaginitis of flexor digitorum is superior to local blocking injection. However, the quality of the RCTs is low, so more large-sample, multi-center, and high-quality clinical RCTs are required for further verification.