Posterior only approaches versus anterior only approaches and combined posterior and anterior approaches for thorac-ic tuberculosis in adults:minimum 5-year follow-up
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2016.11.001
- VernacularTitle:单纯后路、单纯前路或前后联合入路治疗成人胸椎结核的中期疗效分析
- Author:
Hongqi ZHANG
;
Longjie WANG
;
Mingxing TANG
;
Qile GAO
;
Jinyang LIU
;
Jianhuang WU
;
Jianzhong HU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Thoracic vertebrae;
Tuberculosis,spinal;
Treatment outcome;
Follow-up studies
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2016;36(11):641-650
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the minimum 5?year follow?up outcomes of surgical management by posterior only ap?proaches, anterior only approaches and combined posterior and anterior approaches for thoracic tuberculosis in adults, and evalu?ate the mid term follow?up results of posterior only approaches. Methods All of 184 patients with monosegment thoracic tubercu?losis between January 2003 and November 2010 were studied retrospectively. Among these patients, 62 cases were treated with posterior debridement combine with interbody fusion (PO group), 65 cases were treated by posterior instrumentation, anterior de?bridement and bone graft in one or two?stage procedures (AP Group ), and 57 cases were treated by anterior only approach (AO Group). The operation time, blood loss, Visual Analogue Scale, complications, recovery of neurological function, kyphosis angle, correction rate and loss angle were respectively compared between each group. Results Comparison of postoperative curative ef?fects showed:mean operation time and blood loss:PO group (260.05±30.75 min,735.95±161.43 ml) was better than AP group (411.65 ± 55.61 min, 1178.65 ± 184.50 ml)and AO group (343.65 ± 24.74 min, 965.35 ± 122.59 ml);corrective angle and correction rate:PO group (6.78°±1.13°, 72.48%±12.97%) and AP group (6.97°±1.05°, 73.10%±11.42%) were better than AO group (13.98°± 1.73°, 44.95%±16.84%);bed time:PO group and AO group were shorter than AP group. Mid term follow?up outcomes showed:ky?phosis angle and loss angle:PO group (8.56°±1.09°, 1.89°±1.41°) and AP group (8.55°±1.65°, 1.63°±1.11°) were better than AO group (16.39°±1.59°, 2.80°±1.29°);bone fusion time, VAS and recovery of neurological function:there were no statistically differ?ence in all groups. Conclusion The mid term follow?up outcomes of posterior debridement combined with interbody fusion is sat?isfied in the management of monosegment thoracic tuberculosis. It is a safe and effective method.
