Comparison of the effects of two endometrial preparation scheme in patients with thin endometrium in frozen thawed embryo transplantation
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2016.11.017
- VernacularTitle:两种内膜准备方案在薄型子宫内膜冻融胚胎移植中的临床效果比较
- Author:
Huimei WU
;
Hua YUAN
;
Liuming LI
;
Li JIANG
;
Mujun LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Frozen-thawed embryo transfer;
Thin endometrium;
Hormone replace treatment;
Endometrial prepration
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2016;23(11):1668-1672
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the application value of two kinds of endometrial preparation in patients with thin endometrium of frozen thawed embryo transfer cycle.Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 82 cycle of 76 patients was carried out.According to the difference of the endometrial preparation,the two groups were divided into two groups.One group was progynova group (42 cycles),and the other group was femonston group (40 cycles).Baseline information,endometrial status and pregnancy outcome were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in baseline data (age,years of infertility,body mass index,basal hormone level) between the two groups.There was no significant difference in endometrial thickness[progynova group (5.52 ± 0.74) mm,femonston group (5.33 ± 0.66) mm,t =1.290,P =0.203],endometrial volume (progynova grouP ＜ 2mL and ≥ 2mL 38 patients and 4 patients,that of femonston group 36 cases and 4 cases,x2 =0.005,P =0.942),endometrial type (progynova group A,B,C type 35 cases,7 cases,0 case,those of emonston group 34 cases,6 cases,0 case,x2 =0.043,P =0.836) and blood flow (progynova group Ⅰ + Ⅱ and Ⅲ 34 cases and 8 cases,those of femonston group 35 cases and 5 cases,x2 =0.658,.P =0.417) between the two groups before treatment.After administration,endometrial thickness [progynova group (6.90 ± 0.62) mm,femonston group (7.60 ± 0.63) mm,t =5.04,P =0.000],neointimal growth [progynova group (1.67 ± 0.48) mm,femonston group (3.20 ± 0.61) mm,t =12.74,P =0.000],ratio of endometrial volume more than or equal to 2 mL [progynova group 52.38 ％ (22/42),femonston group 80.00％ (32/40),x2 =6.95,P =0.008],and ratio of endometrial blood flow type Ⅲ [progynova group 38.10％ (16/42),femonston group 70.00％ (28/40),x2 =8.387,P =0.004] of femonston group were higher than those of progynova group.The dosage[progynova group (112.43 ± 16.39)mg,femonston group (78.85 ± 10.17)mg,t =11.08,P =0.000] was lower than that of progynova group,and the difference was statistically significant.There was no significant difference in the two groups in endometrial type (progynova group A,B,C 30 cases,12 cases and 0 case,those of femonston group 28,12 and 0,x2 =0.020,P =0.887) after the treatment.There was no significant difference in the number of transplanted embryos (progynova group 1.78 ± 0.47,femonston group 1.77 ± 0.42,t =0.108,P =0.914),high quality embryo rate [progynova group 74.67 ％ (56/75),femonston group 73.24 ％ (52/71),x2 =0.039,P =0.844],implantation rate [progynova group 14.67 ％ (11/75),femonston group 16.90％ (12/71),x2 =0.137,P =0.711],biochemical pregnancy rate[progynova group 38.10％ (16/42),femonston group 40.00％ (16/40),x2 =0.031,P =0.860] and clinical pregnancy rate [progynova group 28.57 ％ (12/42),femonston group 32.50％ (13/40),x2 =0.149,P =0.699] between the two groups.Conclusion Femonston with less dosage,better improvement of the endometrial thickness,endometrial volume,endometrial blood flow of patients with thin endometrium of patients can obtain similar pregnancy outcomes compared with progynova.
