Comparative clinical study on radiologic placement of central venous ports via different puncture area
10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2016.11.021
- VernacularTitle:不同途径植入静脉输液港的临床应用比较
- Author:
Liming WANG
;
Tianzhi AN
;
Xuya ZHAO
;
Tianpeng JIANG
;
Jie SONG
;
Jinzhao GE
;
Shi ZHOU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
subclavian vein;
internal jugular vein;
central venous ports;
complication
- From:
Chongqing Medicine
2016;45(11):1511-1514
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the technical success ,complication rates and comfort of the radiologic placement of central venous ports(CVP) via the internal jugular vein ,subclavian vein via subclavian region ,subclavian vein via supraclavicular region un‐der DSA guidance .Methods We retrospectively reviewed 188 CVP patients implanted at hospitals between December 2012 and De‐cember 2013 .The patients were divided into three groups according to the different catheter implantation sites ,internal jugular vein (group A) ,subclavian vein via subclavian region (group B) and subclavian vein via supraclavicular region (group C) .Intraoperative pain score ,technical success rates ,peri‐procedural ,as well as early and late complication rates were recorded based on the image fol‐low‐up and patient medical records .Results The technical success rate was 100 .0% without any lethal complications .The CVP re‐lated infections were occurred in each group with 1 patient ,but there was no statistics significant different(P>0 .05) .Subclavian vein thrombosis were occurred 2(2 .1% ,2/96) in group B ,which was recanalized after thrombolytic therapy ,and 1(1 .7% ,1/60) in group C ,which was completely occluded .The higher rate of catheter migration and kinking of catheter were occurred in group A and group C .The rate was statistically significant difference among the three groups (P<0 .01) .The late complication rates were statistically higher in group A and C compared with group B (P<0 .05) .The punch‐off was just occurred in group B (n=2) .There were no significant differences about catheter fracture ,port rotation and wound dehiscence among the three groups(P>0 .05) .Con‐clusion In DSA radiologic placement of a CVP via the subclavian vein via subclavian region is safe and efficient with more comfort‐able and lower complication rates ,which could be chosen priority .
