Superiority, Confusion and Countermeasures to DCD WeChat Ethical Review
- VernacularTitle:DCD微信伦理审查的优越性、困惑与对策
- Author:
Lan LI
;
Guishu CHEN
;
Shaohong YU
;
Yongheng ZHAO
;
Chao LI
;
Riuhong ZHANG
;
Hongqing ZHANG
;
Wenhu JIANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
DCD;
WeChat;
Ethical Review;
Superiority;
Privacy Protection
- From:
Chinese Medical Ethics
2016;29(2):288-290
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
DCD WeChat ethical review had its necessity and superiority but problems and confusion as well. For instance, WeChat review time was urgent and limited;WeChat review discussed insufficiently even hard to car-ry out;the methods of WeChat review were limited;the authenticity of audit opinion was difficult to grasp;the re-view data privacy existed hidden danger;the review quality was difficult to guarantee;WeChat conference content file archive was difficult, and so on. As to this, the author put forward the following countermeasures:giving war-ranty on the ethical review time as far as possible;initiating the committee review by the referee and uploading the review information to WeChat group, then ethical reviewers expressing their opinions in real names to ensure data confidentiality and privacy protection; strengthening the ethics committee education for organ transplantation; im-proving the quality of the review committee members and moral cultivation;archiving the WeChat conference infor-mation.
