Comparison of two methods of early treatment in developmental dislocation of the hips
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2016.07.003
- VernacularTitle:Pavlik吊带与牵引石膏早期治疗发育性髋脱位的疗效比较
- Author:
Zhe FU
;
Jianping YANG
;
Zhongli ZHANG
;
Kan WANG
;
Shuzhen DENG
;
Zhaoqiang CHEN
;
Liwei XIE
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Hip dislocation,congenital;
Bone diseases,developmental;
Orthopedic fixation devices
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2016;36(7):399-405
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the early treatment results of Pavlik harness and closed reduction plus spica cast?ing in treating developmental dislocation of the hips (DDH). Methods The patients with GrafⅢ/Ⅳtype DDH diagnosed by ul?trasound in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively from January 2009 to December 2013. The subjects with intact clinical and radiologic data and more than 2 years follow?up were included. The present study included 257 patients (298 hips), 31 male and 226 female, with the average age of 74.1±39.2 d (from 30 to 159 d). Pavlik harness underwent in 190, while 67 cases were treated with closed reduction plus spica casting. Acetabular index (AI), Wiberg OE angle (point O was the middle point of proximal me?taphyseal border) and Smith instability index (SI, SI?c:the lateral displacement index, SI?h:the vertical displacement index) on the pelvic X?ray film at 2-3 years of age after successful early treatment were recorded. Femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) was diagnosed according to the Salter criteria. Results The success rate of reduction of closed reduction was significantly higher than Pavlik harness (97.5% vs. 69.9%, χ2=0.353, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in the incidence of AVN be?tween the closed reduction and Pavlik harness (6.6% vs. 4.6%, χ2=0.106, P=0.745). For GrafⅢ type DDH, the success rate of reduction of Pavlik harness and closed reduction were 80.7% and 98.4% respectively (χ2=11.248, P=0.001), while the Pavlik harness group had significantly worse results of AI, OE and SI?c at the age of 2-3 years (Pavlik harness: 22.9°±3.7°, 16.5°± 6.3° and 0.74 ± 0.06; closed reduction: 21.4° ± 3.4° , 18.9° ± 3.6° and 0.72 ± 0.03; P<0.05). For GrafⅣ type DDH, the success rate of reduction of Pavlik harness was much less than closed reduction (25.6% vs. 94.4%, χ2=24.231, P=0.001), with signifi?cantly worse results of OE at the age of 2-3 years (16.0°±4.1° vs. 18.6°±4.5°, t=-2.141, P=0.038). Conclusion Pavlik har?ness has limitations in treating GrafⅢ/Ⅳtype DDH, with lower success rate of reduction for GrafⅣtype DDH. Closed reduction plus spica casting has better clinical results than Pavlik harness in success rate of reduction and subsequent hip development with? out the additional risk of AVN.
